Megafloods in Europe can be anticipated from observations in hydrologically similar catchments

Miriam Bertola*, Günter Blöschl, Milon Bohac, Marco Borga, Attilio Castellarin, Giovanni B. Chirico, Pierluigi Claps, Eleonora Dallan, Irina Danilovich, Daniele Ganora, Liudmyla Gorbachova, Ondrej Ledvinka, Maria Mavrova-Guirguinova, Alberto Montanari, Valeriya Ovcharuk, Alberto Viglione, Elena Volpi, Berit Arheimer, Giuseppe Tito Aronica, Ognjen BonacciIvan Čanjevac, Andras Csik, Natalia Frolova, Boglarka Gnandt, Zoltan Gribovszki, Ali Gül, Knut Günther, Björn Guse, Jamie Hannaford, Shaun Harrigan, Maria Kireeva, Silvia Kohnová, Jürgen Komma, Jurate Kriauciuniene, Brian Kronvang, Deborah Lawrence, Stefan Lüdtke, Luis Mediero, Bruno Merz, Peter Molnar, Conor Murphy, Dijana Oskoruš, Marzena Osuch, Juraj Parajka, Laurent Pfister, Ivan Radevski, Eric Sauquet, Kai Schröter, Mojca Šraj, Jan Szolgay, Stephen Turner, Peter Valent, Noora Veijalainen, Philip J. Ward, Patrick Willems, Nenad Zivkovic

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

78 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Megafloods that far exceed previously observed records often take citizens and experts by surprise, resulting in extremely severe damage and loss of life. Existing methods based on local and regional information rarely go beyond national borders and cannot predict these floods well because of limited data on megafloods, and because flood generation processes of extremes differ from those of smaller, more frequently observed events. Here we analyse river discharge observations from over 8,000 gauging stations across Europe and show that recent megafloods could have been anticipated from those previously observed in other places in Europe. Almost all observed megafloods (95.5%) fall within the envelope values estimated from previous floods in other similar places on the continent, implying that local surprises are not surprising at the continental scale. This holds also for older events, indicating that megafloods have not changed much in time relative to their spatial variability. The underlying concept of the study is that catchments with similar flood generation processes produce similar outliers. It is thus essential to transcend national boundaries and learn from other places across the continent to avoid surprises and save lives.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)982-988
Number of pages7
JournalNature Geoscience
Volume16
Issue number11
Early online date6 Nov 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We acknowledge all flood data providers listed in Extended Data Table . G.B. and M. Bertola were supported by the FWF projects ‘SPATE’ (I 3174, I 4776) and W1219-N22. B.M. and B.G. were supported by the DFG ‘SPATE’ project (FOR 2416). A.V., P.C., D.G., M. Borga and E.D. were supported by the European Union NextGenerationEU ‘RETURN’ Extended Partnership (National Recovery and Resilience Plan—NRRP, Mission 4, Component 2, Investment 1.3—D.D. 1243 2/8/2022, PE0000005). S.K. and J.S. were supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency (number APVV-20-0374) and the VEGA Grant Agency (number 1/0782/21). J.H. and S.T. were supported by the ROBIN (Reference Observatory of Basins for INternational hydrological climate change detection) initiative, with funding from the Natural Environment Research Council (grant number NE/W004038/1). The authors acknowledge the involvement in the data screening process of M. Haas.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Funding

We acknowledge all flood data providers listed in Extended Data Table . G.B. and M. Bertola were supported by the FWF projects ‘SPATE’ (I 3174, I 4776) and W1219-N22. B.M. and B.G. were supported by the DFG ‘SPATE’ project (FOR 2416). A.V., P.C., D.G., M. Borga and E.D. were supported by the European Union NextGenerationEU ‘RETURN’ Extended Partnership (National Recovery and Resilience Plan—NRRP, Mission 4, Component 2, Investment 1.3—D.D. 1243 2/8/2022, PE0000005). S.K. and J.S. were supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency (number APVV-20-0374) and the VEGA Grant Agency (number 1/0782/21). J.H. and S.T. were supported by the ROBIN (Reference Observatory of Basins for INternational hydrological climate change detection) initiative, with funding from the Natural Environment Research Council (grant number NE/W004038/1). The authors acknowledge the involvement in the data screening process of M. Haas.

FundersFunder number
NRRPPE0000005, 1243 2/8/2022
Natural Environment Research CouncilNE/W004038/1
Natural Environment Research Council
European Commission
Deutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftFOR 2416
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Austrian Science FundI 4776, W1219-N22, I 3174
Austrian Science Fund
Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a VývojaAPVV-20-0374
Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja
Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV1/0782/21
Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Megafloods in Europe can be anticipated from observations in hydrologically similar catchments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this