Abstract
Megafloods that far exceed previously observed records often take citizens and experts by surprise, resulting in extremely severe damage and loss of life. Existing methods based on local and regional information rarely go beyond national borders and cannot predict these floods well because of limited data on megafloods, and because flood generation processes of extremes differ from those of smaller, more frequently observed events. Here we analyse river discharge observations from over 8,000 gauging stations across Europe and show that recent megafloods could have been anticipated from those previously observed in other places in Europe. Almost all observed megafloods (95.5%) fall within the envelope values estimated from previous floods in other similar places on the continent, implying that local surprises are not surprising at the continental scale. This holds also for older events, indicating that megafloods have not changed much in time relative to their spatial variability. The underlying concept of the study is that catchments with similar flood generation processes produce similar outliers. It is thus essential to transcend national boundaries and learn from other places across the continent to avoid surprises and save lives.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 982-988 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Nature Geoscience |
Volume | 16 |
Issue number | 11 |
Early online date | 6 Nov 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:We acknowledge all flood data providers listed in Extended Data Table . G.B. and M. Bertola were supported by the FWF projects ‘SPATE’ (I 3174, I 4776) and W1219-N22. B.M. and B.G. were supported by the DFG ‘SPATE’ project (FOR 2416). A.V., P.C., D.G., M. Borga and E.D. were supported by the European Union NextGenerationEU ‘RETURN’ Extended Partnership (National Recovery and Resilience Plan—NRRP, Mission 4, Component 2, Investment 1.3—D.D. 1243 2/8/2022, PE0000005). S.K. and J.S. were supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency (number APVV-20-0374) and the VEGA Grant Agency (number 1/0782/21). J.H. and S.T. were supported by the ROBIN (Reference Observatory of Basins for INternational hydrological climate change detection) initiative, with funding from the Natural Environment Research Council (grant number NE/W004038/1). The authors acknowledge the involvement in the data screening process of M. Haas.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Funding
We acknowledge all flood data providers listed in Extended Data Table . G.B. and M. Bertola were supported by the FWF projects ‘SPATE’ (I 3174, I 4776) and W1219-N22. B.M. and B.G. were supported by the DFG ‘SPATE’ project (FOR 2416). A.V., P.C., D.G., M. Borga and E.D. were supported by the European Union NextGenerationEU ‘RETURN’ Extended Partnership (National Recovery and Resilience Plan—NRRP, Mission 4, Component 2, Investment 1.3—D.D. 1243 2/8/2022, PE0000005). S.K. and J.S. were supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency (number APVV-20-0374) and the VEGA Grant Agency (number 1/0782/21). J.H. and S.T. were supported by the ROBIN (Reference Observatory of Basins for INternational hydrological climate change detection) initiative, with funding from the Natural Environment Research Council (grant number NE/W004038/1). The authors acknowledge the involvement in the data screening process of M. Haas.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
NRRP | PE0000005, 1243 2/8/2022 |
Natural Environment Research Council | NE/W004038/1 |
Natural Environment Research Council | |
European Commission | |
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft | FOR 2416 |
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft | |
Austrian Science Fund | I 4776, W1219-N22, I 3174 |
Austrian Science Fund | |
Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja | APVV-20-0374 |
Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja | |
Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV | 1/0782/21 |
Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV |