Memory-based attentional biases survive spatial suppression driven by selection history

Dirk van Moorselaar*, Jan Theeuwes, Christian N. L Olivers

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Information in visual working memory that is only prospectively relevant can nevertheless guide attention towards memory matching visual input. Previous studies demonstrated that such memory-based attentional biases can be modulated by top-down processing strategies. Here we examined whether attentional capture by memory matching distractors is also modulated by more implicit biases stemming from selection history. Observers performed a visual search task while holding a colour in memory for a subsequent task. Crucially, a coloured distractor in the search display not only matched the memory content half of the time, it also appeared on one location more often than on all other locations. Consistent with statistical learning having a strong impact on attentional priorities, attentional capture by the distractor was attenuated at high probability distractor locations. The additional slowing by memory matching distractors, however, was the same at suppressed and non-suppressed locations. We interpret this finding as evidence that memory-based feature biases are independent from learned spatial biases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)343-350
Number of pages8
JournalVisual Cognition
Volume27
Issue number3-4
Early online date5 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Bibliographical note

Special Issue: Dealing with Distractors in Visual Search.

Keywords

  • attentional capture
  • suppression
  • visual search
  • Working memory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Memory-based attentional biases survive spatial suppression driven by selection history'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this