Mental disorders as networks of problems: a review of recent insights

Eiko I Fried, Claudia D van Borkulo, Angélique O J Cramer, Lynn Boschloo, Robert A Schoevers, Denny Borsboom

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE: The network perspective on psychopathology understands mental disorders as complex networks of interacting symptoms. Despite its recent debut, with conceptual foundations in 2008 and empirical foundations in 2010, the framework has received considerable attention and recognition in the last years.

METHODS: This paper provides a review of all empirical network studies published between 2010 and 2016 and discusses them according to three main themes: comorbidity, prediction, and clinical intervention.

RESULTS: Pertaining to comorbidity, the network approach provides a powerful new framework to explain why certain disorders may co-occur more often than others. For prediction, studies have consistently found that symptom networks of people with mental disorders show different characteristics than that of healthy individuals, and preliminary evidence suggests that networks of healthy people show early warning signals before shifting into disordered states. For intervention, centrality-a metric that measures how connected and clinically relevant a symptom is in a network-is the most commonly studied topic, and numerous studies have suggested that targeting the most central symptoms may offer novel therapeutic strategies.

CONCLUSIONS: We sketch future directions for the network approach pertaining to both clinical and methodological research, and conclude that network analysis has yielded important insights and may provide an important inroad towards personalized medicine by investigating the network structures of individual patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalSocial Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Volume52
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017

Fingerprint

mental disorder
Mental Disorders
Comorbidity
Precision Medicine
Psychopathology
Research
comorbidity
development of methods
Therapeutics
psychopathology
network analysis
medicine
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Comorbidity
  • Humans
  • Mental Disorders/diagnosis
  • Models, Psychological

Cite this

Fried, Eiko I ; van Borkulo, Claudia D ; Cramer, Angélique O J ; Boschloo, Lynn ; Schoevers, Robert A ; Borsboom, Denny. / Mental disorders as networks of problems : a review of recent insights. In: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2017 ; Vol. 52, No. 1. pp. 1-10.
@article{907ecf799a854ac9b01f1d2bc0df33bb,
title = "Mental disorders as networks of problems: a review of recent insights",
abstract = "PURPOSE: The network perspective on psychopathology understands mental disorders as complex networks of interacting symptoms. Despite its recent debut, with conceptual foundations in 2008 and empirical foundations in 2010, the framework has received considerable attention and recognition in the last years.METHODS: This paper provides a review of all empirical network studies published between 2010 and 2016 and discusses them according to three main themes: comorbidity, prediction, and clinical intervention.RESULTS: Pertaining to comorbidity, the network approach provides a powerful new framework to explain why certain disorders may co-occur more often than others. For prediction, studies have consistently found that symptom networks of people with mental disorders show different characteristics than that of healthy individuals, and preliminary evidence suggests that networks of healthy people show early warning signals before shifting into disordered states. For intervention, centrality-a metric that measures how connected and clinically relevant a symptom is in a network-is the most commonly studied topic, and numerous studies have suggested that targeting the most central symptoms may offer novel therapeutic strategies.CONCLUSIONS: We sketch future directions for the network approach pertaining to both clinical and methodological research, and conclude that network analysis has yielded important insights and may provide an important inroad towards personalized medicine by investigating the network structures of individual patients.",
keywords = "Adult, Comorbidity, Humans, Mental Disorders/diagnosis, Models, Psychological",
author = "Fried, {Eiko I} and {van Borkulo}, {Claudia D} and Cramer, {Ang{\'e}lique O J} and Lynn Boschloo and Schoevers, {Robert A} and Denny Borsboom",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00127-016-1319-z",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology",
issn = "0933-7954",
publisher = "D. Steinkopff-Verlag",
number = "1",

}

Mental disorders as networks of problems : a review of recent insights. / Fried, Eiko I; van Borkulo, Claudia D; Cramer, Angélique O J; Boschloo, Lynn; Schoevers, Robert A; Borsboom, Denny.

In: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, Vol. 52, No. 1, 01.2017, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mental disorders as networks of problems

T2 - a review of recent insights

AU - Fried, Eiko I

AU - van Borkulo, Claudia D

AU - Cramer, Angélique O J

AU - Boschloo, Lynn

AU - Schoevers, Robert A

AU - Borsboom, Denny

PY - 2017/1

Y1 - 2017/1

N2 - PURPOSE: The network perspective on psychopathology understands mental disorders as complex networks of interacting symptoms. Despite its recent debut, with conceptual foundations in 2008 and empirical foundations in 2010, the framework has received considerable attention and recognition in the last years.METHODS: This paper provides a review of all empirical network studies published between 2010 and 2016 and discusses them according to three main themes: comorbidity, prediction, and clinical intervention.RESULTS: Pertaining to comorbidity, the network approach provides a powerful new framework to explain why certain disorders may co-occur more often than others. For prediction, studies have consistently found that symptom networks of people with mental disorders show different characteristics than that of healthy individuals, and preliminary evidence suggests that networks of healthy people show early warning signals before shifting into disordered states. For intervention, centrality-a metric that measures how connected and clinically relevant a symptom is in a network-is the most commonly studied topic, and numerous studies have suggested that targeting the most central symptoms may offer novel therapeutic strategies.CONCLUSIONS: We sketch future directions for the network approach pertaining to both clinical and methodological research, and conclude that network analysis has yielded important insights and may provide an important inroad towards personalized medicine by investigating the network structures of individual patients.

AB - PURPOSE: The network perspective on psychopathology understands mental disorders as complex networks of interacting symptoms. Despite its recent debut, with conceptual foundations in 2008 and empirical foundations in 2010, the framework has received considerable attention and recognition in the last years.METHODS: This paper provides a review of all empirical network studies published between 2010 and 2016 and discusses them according to three main themes: comorbidity, prediction, and clinical intervention.RESULTS: Pertaining to comorbidity, the network approach provides a powerful new framework to explain why certain disorders may co-occur more often than others. For prediction, studies have consistently found that symptom networks of people with mental disorders show different characteristics than that of healthy individuals, and preliminary evidence suggests that networks of healthy people show early warning signals before shifting into disordered states. For intervention, centrality-a metric that measures how connected and clinically relevant a symptom is in a network-is the most commonly studied topic, and numerous studies have suggested that targeting the most central symptoms may offer novel therapeutic strategies.CONCLUSIONS: We sketch future directions for the network approach pertaining to both clinical and methodological research, and conclude that network analysis has yielded important insights and may provide an important inroad towards personalized medicine by investigating the network structures of individual patients.

KW - Adult

KW - Comorbidity

KW - Humans

KW - Mental Disorders/diagnosis

KW - Models, Psychological

U2 - 10.1007/s00127-016-1319-z

DO - 10.1007/s00127-016-1319-z

M3 - Review article

VL - 52

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

JF - Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

SN - 0933-7954

IS - 1

ER -