Metaphorical framing in political discourse through words vs. concepts: A meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Conceptual metaphor theory and other important theories in metaphor research are often experimentally tested by studying the effects of metaphorical frames on individuals' reasoning. Metaphorical frames can be identified by at least two levels of analysis: words vs. concepts. Previous overviews of metaphorical-framing effects have mostly focused on metaphorical framing through words (metaphorical-words frames) rather than through concepts (metaphorical-concepts frames). This means that these overviews included only experimental studies that looked at variations in individual words instead of at the broader logic of messages. For this reason, we conducted a meta-analysis (k = 91, N = 34,783) to compare the persuasive impact of both types of metaphorical frames. Given that patterns of metaphor usage differ across discourse domains, and that effects may differ across modalities and discourse domains, we focused on one mode of presentation and one discourse domain only: verbal metaphorical framing in political discourse. Results showed that, compared to non-metaphorical frames, both metaphorical-words and metaphorical-concepts frames positively influenced beliefs and attitudes. Yet, these effects were larger for metaphorical-concepts frames. We therefore argue that future research should more explicitly describe and justify which level of analysis is chosen to examine the nature and effects of metaphorical framing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-65
Number of pages25
JournalLanguage and Cognition
Volume11
Issue number1
Early online date25 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Metaphor
Meta-Analysis
discourse
metaphor
Research
Political Discourse
Meta-analysis

Keywords

  • metaphor
  • framing
  • meta-analysis
  • political persuasion

Cite this

@article{1c15a12e8a084ef3b733f6dadddc6be0,
title = "Metaphorical framing in political discourse through words vs. concepts: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "Conceptual metaphor theory and other important theories in metaphor research are often experimentally tested by studying the effects of metaphorical frames on individuals' reasoning. Metaphorical frames can be identified by at least two levels of analysis: words vs. concepts. Previous overviews of metaphorical-framing effects have mostly focused on metaphorical framing through words (metaphorical-words frames) rather than through concepts (metaphorical-concepts frames). This means that these overviews included only experimental studies that looked at variations in individual words instead of at the broader logic of messages. For this reason, we conducted a meta-analysis (k = 91, N = 34,783) to compare the persuasive impact of both types of metaphorical frames. Given that patterns of metaphor usage differ across discourse domains, and that effects may differ across modalities and discourse domains, we focused on one mode of presentation and one discourse domain only: verbal metaphorical framing in political discourse. Results showed that, compared to non-metaphorical frames, both metaphorical-words and metaphorical-concepts frames positively influenced beliefs and attitudes. Yet, these effects were larger for metaphorical-concepts frames. We therefore argue that future research should more explicitly describe and justify which level of analysis is chosen to examine the nature and effects of metaphorical framing.",
keywords = "metaphor, framing, meta-analysis, political persuasion",
author = "Brugman, {Britta C.} and Christian Burgers and Barbara Vis",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1017/langcog.2019.5",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "41--65",
journal = "Language and Cognition",
issn = "1866-9808",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

Metaphorical framing in political discourse through words vs. concepts: A meta-analysis. / Brugman, Britta C.; Burgers, Christian; Vis, Barbara.

In: Language and Cognition, Vol. 11, No. 1, 03.2019, p. 41-65.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Metaphorical framing in political discourse through words vs. concepts: A meta-analysis

AU - Brugman, Britta C.

AU - Burgers, Christian

AU - Vis, Barbara

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - Conceptual metaphor theory and other important theories in metaphor research are often experimentally tested by studying the effects of metaphorical frames on individuals' reasoning. Metaphorical frames can be identified by at least two levels of analysis: words vs. concepts. Previous overviews of metaphorical-framing effects have mostly focused on metaphorical framing through words (metaphorical-words frames) rather than through concepts (metaphorical-concepts frames). This means that these overviews included only experimental studies that looked at variations in individual words instead of at the broader logic of messages. For this reason, we conducted a meta-analysis (k = 91, N = 34,783) to compare the persuasive impact of both types of metaphorical frames. Given that patterns of metaphor usage differ across discourse domains, and that effects may differ across modalities and discourse domains, we focused on one mode of presentation and one discourse domain only: verbal metaphorical framing in political discourse. Results showed that, compared to non-metaphorical frames, both metaphorical-words and metaphorical-concepts frames positively influenced beliefs and attitudes. Yet, these effects were larger for metaphorical-concepts frames. We therefore argue that future research should more explicitly describe and justify which level of analysis is chosen to examine the nature and effects of metaphorical framing.

AB - Conceptual metaphor theory and other important theories in metaphor research are often experimentally tested by studying the effects of metaphorical frames on individuals' reasoning. Metaphorical frames can be identified by at least two levels of analysis: words vs. concepts. Previous overviews of metaphorical-framing effects have mostly focused on metaphorical framing through words (metaphorical-words frames) rather than through concepts (metaphorical-concepts frames). This means that these overviews included only experimental studies that looked at variations in individual words instead of at the broader logic of messages. For this reason, we conducted a meta-analysis (k = 91, N = 34,783) to compare the persuasive impact of both types of metaphorical frames. Given that patterns of metaphor usage differ across discourse domains, and that effects may differ across modalities and discourse domains, we focused on one mode of presentation and one discourse domain only: verbal metaphorical framing in political discourse. Results showed that, compared to non-metaphorical frames, both metaphorical-words and metaphorical-concepts frames positively influenced beliefs and attitudes. Yet, these effects were larger for metaphorical-concepts frames. We therefore argue that future research should more explicitly describe and justify which level of analysis is chosen to examine the nature and effects of metaphorical framing.

KW - metaphor

KW - framing

KW - meta-analysis

KW - political persuasion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063482507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063482507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/langcog.2019.5

DO - 10.1017/langcog.2019.5

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 41

EP - 65

JO - Language and Cognition

JF - Language and Cognition

SN - 1866-9808

IS - 1

ER -