Migration, Membership, and Republican Liberty

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Neorepublicanism holds that domination is the foremost political evil. More, it claims to be able to address today’s most pressing issues. It follows that neorepublicanism should, then, speak to questions of migration, membership, and domination. However, this is not the case. Some critical voices inspired by the idea of non-domination arrive at interesting critiques of migration, membership, and domination, but their answers are often partial and in some ways problematic. They are also largely ahistorical. The contemporary paucity of neorepublican reflections on migration contrasts sharply with its centrality in republican history. In the US, from the colonial period until late into the 19th century, some republicans understood the domination of migrants and citizens as conjoined concerns. They developed a robust account of the relationship between domestic domination and exclusionary migration regimes. They conceptualized the republic as a global asylum where membership is based on volitional allegiance, and they vigorously defended the right of aliens to expatriate. Those ideas were ultimately defeated by aristocratic, oligarchic, and statist forces. This article explicates that history through a genealogical account of what I call ‘insurgent republicanism’. The article then returns to contemporary theorization to diagnose its limitations, continuities, and potentials as seen from the perspective of the insurgent republican tradition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179–205
Number of pages27
JournalCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
Volume24
Issue number2
Early online date24 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Neorepublicanism
  • insurgent republicanism
  • membership
  • migration
  • non-domination

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Migration, Membership, and Republican Liberty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this