Misrecognition in legal practice: The aporia of the Family of Nations

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article discusses the concept of misrecognition to analyse international legal ordering in the practice of colonial treatymaking. As critical interventions to the debate on recognition have made clear, recognition is about exclusion as much as it is about inclusion. The most obvious example is the nineteenth-century applications of the standard of civilisation, where the European Family of Nations introduced the criterion of 'civilisation', which excluded non-European entities as sovereigns and legitimised their colonisation. But at the same time colonial treaties included the 'savage rulers' as signatory powers, and thus legal persons within the international legal order that at once excluded them. This contribution to the Special Issue discusses these treatymaking practices as a practice of misrecognition; not because it misrecognises some natural, essential, or true identity of the indigenous entities, but as a misrecognition of the international order's own conditions of possibility through practices that simultaneously constitute that order and undermine its constitutive conditions. A rereading of Hegel's famous master-slave metaphor through the concept of misrecognition sheds light on the reversals and contradictions of the colonial legal enterprise and reveals the aporia of the contemporary international legal order by showing the void at its heart.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)863-881
Number of pages19
JournalReview of International Studies
Volume44
Issue number5
Early online date20 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018

Fingerprint

legal usage
legal order
civilization
slave
colonization
treaty
metaphor
nineteenth century
exclusion
inclusion
human being

Bibliographical note

Special Issue on Misrecognition in World Politics: Revisiting Hegel

Keywords

  • Family of Nations
  • Hegel
  • Misrecognition
  • Standard of Civilisation
  • Treatymaking

Cite this

@article{e11be0b10a9748c3b68b13406ac59547,
title = "Misrecognition in legal practice: The aporia of the Family of Nations",
abstract = "This article discusses the concept of misrecognition to analyse international legal ordering in the practice of colonial treatymaking. As critical interventions to the debate on recognition have made clear, recognition is about exclusion as much as it is about inclusion. The most obvious example is the nineteenth-century applications of the standard of civilisation, where the European Family of Nations introduced the criterion of 'civilisation', which excluded non-European entities as sovereigns and legitimised their colonisation. But at the same time colonial treaties included the 'savage rulers' as signatory powers, and thus legal persons within the international legal order that at once excluded them. This contribution to the Special Issue discusses these treatymaking practices as a practice of misrecognition; not because it misrecognises some natural, essential, or true identity of the indigenous entities, but as a misrecognition of the international order's own conditions of possibility through practices that simultaneously constitute that order and undermine its constitutive conditions. A rereading of Hegel's famous master-slave metaphor through the concept of misrecognition sheds light on the reversals and contradictions of the colonial legal enterprise and reveals the aporia of the contemporary international legal order by showing the void at its heart.",
keywords = "Family of Nations, Hegel, Misrecognition, Standard of Civilisation, Treatymaking",
author = "Tanja Aalberts",
note = "Special Issue on Misrecognition in World Politics: Revisiting Hegel",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1017/S0260210518000384",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "863--881",
journal = "Review of International Studies",
issn = "0260-2105",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "5",

}

Misrecognition in legal practice : The aporia of the Family of Nations. / Aalberts, Tanja.

In: Review of International Studies, Vol. 44, No. 5, 12.2018, p. 863-881.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Misrecognition in legal practice

T2 - The aporia of the Family of Nations

AU - Aalberts, Tanja

N1 - Special Issue on Misrecognition in World Politics: Revisiting Hegel

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - This article discusses the concept of misrecognition to analyse international legal ordering in the practice of colonial treatymaking. As critical interventions to the debate on recognition have made clear, recognition is about exclusion as much as it is about inclusion. The most obvious example is the nineteenth-century applications of the standard of civilisation, where the European Family of Nations introduced the criterion of 'civilisation', which excluded non-European entities as sovereigns and legitimised their colonisation. But at the same time colonial treaties included the 'savage rulers' as signatory powers, and thus legal persons within the international legal order that at once excluded them. This contribution to the Special Issue discusses these treatymaking practices as a practice of misrecognition; not because it misrecognises some natural, essential, or true identity of the indigenous entities, but as a misrecognition of the international order's own conditions of possibility through practices that simultaneously constitute that order and undermine its constitutive conditions. A rereading of Hegel's famous master-slave metaphor through the concept of misrecognition sheds light on the reversals and contradictions of the colonial legal enterprise and reveals the aporia of the contemporary international legal order by showing the void at its heart.

AB - This article discusses the concept of misrecognition to analyse international legal ordering in the practice of colonial treatymaking. As critical interventions to the debate on recognition have made clear, recognition is about exclusion as much as it is about inclusion. The most obvious example is the nineteenth-century applications of the standard of civilisation, where the European Family of Nations introduced the criterion of 'civilisation', which excluded non-European entities as sovereigns and legitimised their colonisation. But at the same time colonial treaties included the 'savage rulers' as signatory powers, and thus legal persons within the international legal order that at once excluded them. This contribution to the Special Issue discusses these treatymaking practices as a practice of misrecognition; not because it misrecognises some natural, essential, or true identity of the indigenous entities, but as a misrecognition of the international order's own conditions of possibility through practices that simultaneously constitute that order and undermine its constitutive conditions. A rereading of Hegel's famous master-slave metaphor through the concept of misrecognition sheds light on the reversals and contradictions of the colonial legal enterprise and reveals the aporia of the contemporary international legal order by showing the void at its heart.

KW - Family of Nations

KW - Hegel

KW - Misrecognition

KW - Standard of Civilisation

KW - Treatymaking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056986962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056986962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0260210518000384

DO - 10.1017/S0260210518000384

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 863

EP - 881

JO - Review of International Studies

JF - Review of International Studies

SN - 0260-2105

IS - 5

ER -