TY - JOUR
T1 - Mitigation and adaptation in polycentric systems
T2 - sources of power in the pursuit of collective goals
AU - Morrison, Tiffany H.
AU - Adger, W. Neil
AU - Brown, Katrina
AU - Lemos, Maria Carmen
AU - Huitema, Dave
AU - Hughes, Terry P.
PY - 2017/9/1
Y1 - 2017/9/1
N2 - Polycentric governance involves multiple actors at multiple scales beyond the state. The potential of polycentric governance for promoting both climate mitigation and adaptation is well established. Yet, dominant conceptualizations of polycentric governance pay scant attention to how power dynamics affect the structure and the outcomes of climate action. We review emerging evidence on power within polycentric and distributed governance across the climate, forestry, marine, coastal, urban, and water sectors, and relate them to established positions on power within research on federalism, decentralization, international relations, and networked governance. We develop a typology of design, pragmatic, and framing power that focuses on how and in whose interests power is mobilized to achieve outcomes. We propose that the conceptual model helps to explain power dynamics across different sectors and across both climate change mitigation and adaptation. Significant research challenges arising from the analysis include the measurement and monitoring of the outcomes of power asymmetries over time. WIREs Clim Change 2017, 8:e479. doi: 10.1002/wcc.479. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.
AB - Polycentric governance involves multiple actors at multiple scales beyond the state. The potential of polycentric governance for promoting both climate mitigation and adaptation is well established. Yet, dominant conceptualizations of polycentric governance pay scant attention to how power dynamics affect the structure and the outcomes of climate action. We review emerging evidence on power within polycentric and distributed governance across the climate, forestry, marine, coastal, urban, and water sectors, and relate them to established positions on power within research on federalism, decentralization, international relations, and networked governance. We develop a typology of design, pragmatic, and framing power that focuses on how and in whose interests power is mobilized to achieve outcomes. We propose that the conceptual model helps to explain power dynamics across different sectors and across both climate change mitigation and adaptation. Significant research challenges arising from the analysis include the measurement and monitoring of the outcomes of power asymmetries over time. WIREs Clim Change 2017, 8:e479. doi: 10.1002/wcc.479. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021446586&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021446586&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/wcc.479
DO - 10.1002/wcc.479
M3 - Review article
SN - 1757-7799
VL - 8
JO - Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Climate Change
JF - Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Climate Change
IS - 5
M1 - e479
ER -