TY - JOUR
T1 - Modeling subdiffusive light scattering by incorporating the tissue phase function and detector numerical aperture
AU - Post, Anouk L.
AU - Jacques, Steven L.
AU - Sterenborg, Henricus J. C. M.
AU - Faber, DIrk J.
AU - Van Leeuwen, Ton G.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - To detect small-scale changes in tissue with optical techniques, small sampling volumes and, therefore, short source-detector separations are required. In this case, reflectance measurements are not adequately described by the diffusion approximation. Previous studies related subdiffusive reflectance to γ or σ which parameterize the phase function. Recently, it was demonstrated that σ predicts subdiffusive reflectance better than γ, and that σ becomes less predictive for lower numerical apertures (NAs). We derive and evaluate the parameter RpNA, which incorporates the NA of the detector and the integral of the phase function over the NA in the backward and forward directions. Monte Carlo simulations are performed for overlapping source/detector geometries for a range of phase functions, reduced scattering coefficients, NAs, and source/detector diameters. RpNA improves prediction of the measured reflectance compared to γ and σ. It is, therefore, expected that RpNA will improve derivation of optical properties from subdiffusive measurements.
AB - To detect small-scale changes in tissue with optical techniques, small sampling volumes and, therefore, short source-detector separations are required. In this case, reflectance measurements are not adequately described by the diffusion approximation. Previous studies related subdiffusive reflectance to γ or σ which parameterize the phase function. Recently, it was demonstrated that σ predicts subdiffusive reflectance better than γ, and that σ becomes less predictive for lower numerical apertures (NAs). We derive and evaluate the parameter RpNA, which incorporates the NA of the detector and the integral of the phase function over the NA in the backward and forward directions. Monte Carlo simulations are performed for overlapping source/detector geometries for a range of phase functions, reduced scattering coefficients, NAs, and source/detector diameters. RpNA improves prediction of the measured reflectance compared to γ and σ. It is, therefore, expected that RpNA will improve derivation of optical properties from subdiffusive measurements.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019976928&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1117/1.JBO.22.5.050501
DO - 10.1117/1.JBO.22.5.050501
M3 - Article
SN - 1083-3668
VL - 22
JO - Journal of biomedical optics
JF - Journal of biomedical optics
IS - 5
M1 - 050501
ER -