Abstract
Farmland abandonment is a major proximate driver of landscape change in European rural areas and is often followed by natural revegetation. In certain conditions, it might be preferable to prevent or reverse farmland abandonment or manage these areas towards active restoration (i.e., guided rewilding with wild or domesticated animals). These alternative responses to farmland abandonment lead to context-dependent impacts, which can potentially contribute to European Green Deal objectives for environment and rural areas. While previous studies analysed direct impacts of abandonment, there is little insight into how alternative ways of managing abandoned farmland can best contribute to environmental policy goals, and what type of management is preferred where. To assess opportunities in these areas, we compared three abandonment trajectories: natural revegetation, active restoration with rewilding, and extensive re-farming. We analysed the potential positive and negative environmental and cultural impacts of developing these management strategies in all farmland locations that could potentially be abandoned across Europe. Mapping and quantification of the benefits and risks associated with different management responses to abandonment indicate a large spatial variation across regions. While natural revegetation can support high benefits for carbon sequestration and erosion reduction, it is also linked to more frequent trade-offs than re-farming and rewilding. However, there is a very strong spatial variation in these trade-offs. It is worthwhile to focus on areas with the largest gains and fewest trade-offs when targeting investments for prevention of abandonment or rewilding. Our maps can help inform interventions in abandoned farmland to maximise the potential contributions of these lands to the European Green Deal environmental and rural policy targets.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 107460 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-11 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Catena |
Volume | 232 |
Early online date | 19 Aug 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was supported by the project TERRANOVA the European Landscape Learning Initiative, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 813904. The output reflects the views only of the authors, and the European Union cannot be held responsible for any use, which may be made of the information contained therein. The authors expressed their gratitude for the data kindly shared for this research by Emma van der Zanden, Leen Felix, Clara Sueur-Ochoa and Emilo Chuvieco. The authors thank Elena Pearce and Jens-Christian Svenning for their help in designing the Rewilding trajectory. The authors are also highly grateful for the constructive discussions and feedback provided on the manuscript by Chantal Van Ham, Alberto Arroyo Schnell, and Antonia Matthies.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the project TERRANOVA the European Landscape Learning Initiative, which has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 813904. The output reflects the views only of the authors, and the European Union cannot be held responsible for any use, which may be made of the information contained therein. The authors expressed their gratitude for the data kindly shared for this research by Emma van der Zanden, Leen Felix, Clara Sueur-Ochoa and Emilo Chuvieco. The authors thank Elena Pearce and Jens-Christian Svenning for their help in designing the Rewilding trajectory. The authors are also highly grateful for the constructive discussions and feedback provided on the manuscript by Chantal Van Ham, Alberto Arroyo Schnell, and Antonia Matthies.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
Funding
This work was supported by the project TERRANOVA the European Landscape Learning Initiative, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 813904. The output reflects the views only of the authors, and the European Union cannot be held responsible for any use, which may be made of the information contained therein. The authors expressed their gratitude for the data kindly shared for this research by Emma van der Zanden, Leen Felix, Clara Sueur-Ochoa and Emilo Chuvieco. The authors thank Elena Pearce and Jens-Christian Svenning for their help in designing the Rewilding trajectory. The authors are also highly grateful for the constructive discussions and feedback provided on the manuscript by Chantal Van Ham, Alberto Arroyo Schnell, and Antonia Matthies. This work was supported by the project TERRANOVA the European Landscape Learning Initiative, which has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 813904. The output reflects the views only of the authors, and the European Union cannot be held responsible for any use, which may be made of the information contained therein. The authors expressed their gratitude for the data kindly shared for this research by Emma van der Zanden, Leen Felix, Clara Sueur-Ochoa and Emilo Chuvieco. The authors thank Elena Pearce and Jens-Christian Svenning for their help in designing the Rewilding trajectory. The authors are also highly grateful for the constructive discussions and feedback provided on the manuscript by Chantal Van Ham, Alberto Arroyo Schnell, and Antonia Matthies.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Antonia Matthies | |
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme | |
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions | 813904 |
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions | |
European Commission | |
Horizon 2020 |
Keywords
- Abandonment trajectories
- Agricultural abandonment
- Biodiversity
- European Green Deal
- Rewilding
- Trade-offs