Modelling the effects of normal faulting on alluvial river meandering

Hessel A.G. Woolderink*, Steven A.H. Weisscher, Maarten G. Kleinhans, Cornelis Kasse, Ronald T. van Balen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The meandering of alluvial rivers may be forced by normal faulting due to tectonically altered topographic gradients of the river valley and channel at and near the fault zone. Normal faulting can affect river meandering by either instantaneous (e.g. surface-rupturing earthquakes) or gradual displacement. To enhance our understanding of river channel response to tectonic faulting at the fault zone scale we used the physics-based, two-dimensional morphodynamic model Nays2D to simulate the responses of a laboratory-scale alluvial river with vegetated floodplain to various faulting and offset scenarios. The results of a model with normal fault downstepping in the downstream direction show that channel sinuosity and bend radius increase up to a maximum as a result of the faulting-enhanced valley gradient. Hereafter, a chute cutoff reduces channel sinuosity to a new dynamic equilibrium value that is generally higher than the pre-faulting sinuosity. A scenario where a normal fault downsteps in the upstream direction leads to reduced morphological change upstream of the fault due to a backwater effect induced by the faulting. The position within a meander bend at which faulting occurs has a profound influence on the evolution of sinuosity; fault locations that enhance flow velocities over the point bar during floods result in a faster sinuosity increase and subsequent chute cutoff than locations that enhance flow velocity directed towards the floodplain. This upward causation from the bend scale to the reach and floodplain scale arises from the complex interactions between meandering and floodplain and the nonlinearities of the sediment transport and chute cutoff processes. Our model results provide a guideline to include process-based reasoning in the interpretation of geomorphological and sedimentological observations of fluvial response to faulting. The combination of these approaches leads to better predictions of possible effects of faulting on alluvial river meandering.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1252-1270
Number of pages19
JournalEarth Surface Processes and Landforms
Volume47
Issue number5
Early online date30 Dec 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research is funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research as part of the project ‘Sinuosity Response to Faulting in the Roer Valley Rift System’ (Project No. 821.01.011) granted to Ronald T. van Balen. SAHW and MGK were funded by the European Research Council (ERC Consolidator Grant 647570 to MGK). We would like to thank Dr. Catherine Russell and one anonymous reviewer for their constructive and detailed reviews that helped improve this manuscript.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Funding

This research is funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research as part of the project ‘Sinuosity Response to Faulting in the Roer Valley Rift System’ (Project No. 821.01.011) granted to Ronald T. van Balen. SAHW and MGK were funded by the European Research Council (ERC Consolidator Grant 647570 to MGK). We would like to thank Dr. Catherine Russell and one anonymous reviewer for their constructive and detailed reviews that helped improve this manuscript.

FundersFunder number
European Research Council
Ronald T. van Balen
Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research821.01.011
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme647570

    Keywords

    • alluvial rivers
    • faulting
    • meandering
    • modelling
    • morphodynamics
    • morphology
    • neotectonic
    • tectonic

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Modelling the effects of normal faulting on alluvial river meandering'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this