Moderate and Vigorous Physical Activity Intensity Cut-Points for Hip-, Wrist-, Thigh-, and Lower Back Worn Accelerometer in Very Old Adults

Mathias Skjødt*, Jan Christian Brønd, Mark A. Tully, Li Tang Tsai, Annemarie Koster, Marjolein Visser, Paolo Caserotti

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) reduces the risk of negative mental and physical health outcomes in older adults. Traditionally, PA intensity is classified using METs, with 1 MET equal to 3.5 mL O2·min−1·kg−1. However, this may underestimate moderate and vigorous intensity due to age-related changes in resting metabolic rate (RMR) and VO2max. VO2reserve accounts for these changes. While receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis is commonly used to develop PA, intensity cut-points, machine learning (ML) offers a potential alternative. This study aimed to develop ROC cut-points and ML models to classify PA intensity in older adults. Sixty-seven older adults performed activities of daily living (ADL) and two six-minute walking tests (6-MWT) while wearing six accelerometers on their hips, wrists, thigh, and lower back. Oxygen uptake was measured. ROC and ML models were developed for ENMO and Actigraph counts (AGVMC) using VO2reserve as the criterion in two-third of the sample and validated in the remaining third. ROC-developed cut-points showed good-excellent AUC (0.84–0.93) for the hips, lower back, and thigh, but wrist cut-points failed to distinguish between moderate and vigorous intensity. The accuracy of ML models was high and consistent across all six anatomical sites (0.83–0.89). Validation of the ML models showed better results compared to ROC cut-points, with the thigh showing the highest accuracy. This study provides ML models that optimize the classification of PA intensity in very old adults for six anatomical placements hips (left/right), wrist (dominant/non-dominant), thigh and lower back increasing comparability between studies using different wear-position. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04821713.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70009
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalScandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports
Volume35
Issue number1
Early online date3 Jan 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Funding

The study was funded by the European Union\u2019s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 678732). Additionally, the National Institute of Health also provided support for this work, under the grant number HHSN271201800743P. Funding:

FundersFunder number
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme678732
National Institutes of HealthHHSN271201800743P

    Keywords

    • classification
    • machine learning
    • validation
    • VOReserve
    • wearable devices

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Moderate and Vigorous Physical Activity Intensity Cut-Points for Hip-, Wrist-, Thigh-, and Lower Back Worn Accelerometer in Very Old Adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this