Abstract
Objective: Psychosocial interventions can reduce cancer-related fatigue effectively. However, it is still unclear if intervention effects differ across subgroups of patients. These meta-analyses aimed at evaluating moderator effects of (a) sociodemographic characteristics, (b) clinical characteristics, (c) baseline levels of fatigue and other symptoms, and (d) intervention-related characteristics on the effect of psychosocial interventions on cancer-related fatigue in patients with non-metastatic breast and prostate cancer. Methods: Data were retrieved from the Predicting OptimaL cAncer RehabIlitation and Supportive care (POLARIS) consortium. Potential moderators were studied with meta-analyses of pooled individual patient data from 14 randomized controlled trials through linear mixed-effects models with interaction tests. The analyses were conducted separately in patients with breast (n = 1091) and prostate cancer (n = 1008). Results: Statistically significant, small overall effects of psychosocial interventions on fatigue were found (breast cancer: β = −0.19 [95% confidence interval (95%CI) = −0.30; −0.08]; prostate cancer: β = −0.11 [95%CI = −0.21; −0.00]). In both patient groups, intervention effects did not differ significantly by sociodemographic or clinical characteristics, nor by baseline levels of fatigue or pain. For intervention-related moderators (only tested among women with breast cancer), statistically significant larger effects were found for cognitive behavioral therapy as intervention strategy (β = −0.27 [95%CI = −0.40; −0.15]), fatigue-specific interventions (β = −0.48 [95%CI = −0.79; −0.18]), and interventions that only targeted patients with clinically relevant fatigue (β = −0.85 [95%CI = −1.40; −0.30]). Conclusions: Our findings did not provide evidence that any selected demographic or clinical characteristic, or baseline levels of fatigue or pain, moderated effects of psychosocial interventions on fatigue. A specific focus on decreasing fatigue seems beneficial for patients with breast cancer with clinically relevant fatigue.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1772-1785 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Psycho-Oncology |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 11 |
Early online date | 16 Aug 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2020 |
Funding
The POLARIS project is supported by the Bas Mulder Award, granted to L.M. Buffart by the Alpe d'HuZes foundation/Dutch Cancer Society (VU2011-5045). The current study is supported by an Alliance Fund for Mental Health research, granted to H. Knoop and L.M. Buffart by the Amsterdam Public Health research institute.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Alpe d'HuZes foundation/Dutch Cancer Society | VU2011‐5045 |
Alpe d’HuZes foundation/Dutch Cancer Society | |
Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute |
Keywords
- breast cancer
- cancer
- fatigue
- individual patient data meta-analysis
- moderators
- oncology
- prostate cancer
- psycho-oncology
- psychosocial interventions