Moeten we tegen natuurlijke theologie zijn?

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper is a critical discussion of the objections that have been raised against natural theology by both protestant theologians and protestant philosophers. It is argued that the objections that have been raised by Berkouwer, Dooyeweerd and Vollenhoven, as well as Th. de Boer are unconvincing.
Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)251-269
JournalNederlands Theologisch Tijdschrift
Volume69
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this

@article{7052ff2093c5497cb046f5575fb55b9a,
title = "Moeten we tegen natuurlijke theologie zijn?",
abstract = "This paper is a critical discussion of the objections that have been raised against natural theology by both protestant theologians and protestant philosophers. It is argued that the objections that have been raised by Berkouwer, Dooyeweerd and Vollenhoven, as well as Th. de Boer are unconvincing.",
author = "{van Woudenberg}, R.",
year = "2015",
language = "Dutch",
volume = "69",
pages = "251--269",
journal = "Nederlands Theologisch Tijdschrift",
issn = "0028-212X",
publisher = "Boekencentrum uitgevers",
number = "4",

}

Moeten we tegen natuurlijke theologie zijn? / van Woudenberg, R.

In: Nederlands Theologisch Tijdschrift, Vol. 69, No. 4, 2015, p. 251-269.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moeten we tegen natuurlijke theologie zijn?

AU - van Woudenberg, R.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This paper is a critical discussion of the objections that have been raised against natural theology by both protestant theologians and protestant philosophers. It is argued that the objections that have been raised by Berkouwer, Dooyeweerd and Vollenhoven, as well as Th. de Boer are unconvincing.

AB - This paper is a critical discussion of the objections that have been raised against natural theology by both protestant theologians and protestant philosophers. It is argued that the objections that have been raised by Berkouwer, Dooyeweerd and Vollenhoven, as well as Th. de Boer are unconvincing.

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 251

EP - 269

JO - Nederlands Theologisch Tijdschrift

JF - Nederlands Theologisch Tijdschrift

SN - 0028-212X

IS - 4

ER -