Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Monologue and Organization Studies

  • Michal Izak*
  • , Peter Case
  • , Sierk Ybema
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In this essay, we propose that recent work in management and organization studies is typically inclined to understand organization and organizing as dialogic in form. Dialogicity is characterized by dynamic interlocution on the part of active human sense-makers and, in our critical reading, evokes a romanticized social landscape that fails to reflect the more prosaic features of organizational life. To address what we see as certain limitations of the dialogic view, we introduce a complementary point of reference: that of monologic organization. This perspective provokes reflection on those situations in which meanings are predetermined at the outset and communication consists of the strictly controlled, routine reproduction of formal scripts. We draw on the works of Mikhail Bakhtin and Michel Serres to reclaim monologic as a pertinent view of organization and its processes. Finally, we provide micro-, meso- and macro-level examples to illustrate and discuss the heuristic potential of a monologic view.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1507-1522
Number of pages16
JournalOrganization Studies
Volume43
Issue number9
Early online date19 Dec 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • analysis
  • Bakhtin
  • communication
  • dialogue
  • monologue
  • participation
  • Serres

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Monologue and Organization Studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this