Abstract
Moral hazard in natural disaster insurance markets results in policyholders preparing less, increasing the risk they face. However, moral hazard may not arise, due to high risk aversion or market context. We study the relationship between disaster risk reduction and insurance coverage to assess the presence of moral hazard for two different natural hazards, using four econometric models on survey data from Germany and the United States. The results show that moral hazard is absent. Nevertheless, adverse risk selection may be present. This has significant policy relevance such as opportunities for strengthening the link between insurance and risk reduction measures.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 179-208 |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Journal | Land Economics |
| Volume | 93 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 28 Mar 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 May 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Moral Hazard in Natural Disaster Insurance Markets: Empirical Evidence from Germany and the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver