Moral or Dirty Leadership: A Qualitative Study on How Juniors Are Managed in Dutch Consultancies

Onno Bouwmeester, Tessa Elisabeth Kok

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Professional service firms in Western Europe have a reputation for putting huge pressures on their junior employees, resulting in very long work hours, and as a consequence health risks. This study explores moral leadership as a possible response to the stigma of such dirty leadership. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 consultant managers and with each one of their juniors, and found that managers put several pressures on their juniors; these pressures bring high levels of stress, lowered wellbeing and burnout. Society considers such a pressuring leadership style morally dirty. To counteract the experience of being seen as morally dirty, we found that consultant managers were normalizing such criticisms as commonly assumed in dirty work literature. However, they also employed several moral leadership tactics to counteract the negative consequences criticized in society. However, in addition to the well-known individual-level tactics, consultant managers and their juniors also reported moral leadership support at the organizational level, like institutionalized performance talks after every project, trainings, specific criteria for hiring juniors, and policies to recognize and compliment high performance. Still, we cannot conclude these moral leadership approaches are moral by definition. They can be used in an instrumental way as well, to further push performance.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2506
Pages (from-to)1-22
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume15
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

Consultants
Pressure
Interviews
Health

Keywords

  • dirty work
  • management consulting
  • moral leadership
  • taint normalization
  • work organization

Cite this

@article{bd622e90433c46b8b05f91488c763831,
title = "Moral or Dirty Leadership: A Qualitative Study on How Juniors Are Managed in Dutch Consultancies",
abstract = "Professional service firms in Western Europe have a reputation for putting huge pressures on their junior employees, resulting in very long work hours, and as a consequence health risks. This study explores moral leadership as a possible response to the stigma of such dirty leadership. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 consultant managers and with each one of their juniors, and found that managers put several pressures on their juniors; these pressures bring high levels of stress, lowered wellbeing and burnout. Society considers such a pressuring leadership style morally dirty. To counteract the experience of being seen as morally dirty, we found that consultant managers were normalizing such criticisms as commonly assumed in dirty work literature. However, they also employed several moral leadership tactics to counteract the negative consequences criticized in society. However, in addition to the well-known individual-level tactics, consultant managers and their juniors also reported moral leadership support at the organizational level, like institutionalized performance talks after every project, trainings, specific criteria for hiring juniors, and policies to recognize and compliment high performance. Still, we cannot conclude these moral leadership approaches are moral by definition. They can be used in an instrumental way as well, to further push performance.",
keywords = "dirty work, management consulting, moral leadership, taint normalization, work organization",
author = "Onno Bouwmeester and Kok, {Tessa Elisabeth}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "9",
doi = "10.3390/ijerph15112506",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "1--22",
journal = "International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health",
issn = "1660-4601",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "11",

}

Moral or Dirty Leadership : A Qualitative Study on How Juniors Are Managed in Dutch Consultancies. / Bouwmeester, Onno; Kok, Tessa Elisabeth.

In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 15, No. 11, 2506, 09.11.2018, p. 1-22.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moral or Dirty Leadership

T2 - A Qualitative Study on How Juniors Are Managed in Dutch Consultancies

AU - Bouwmeester, Onno

AU - Kok, Tessa Elisabeth

PY - 2018/11/9

Y1 - 2018/11/9

N2 - Professional service firms in Western Europe have a reputation for putting huge pressures on their junior employees, resulting in very long work hours, and as a consequence health risks. This study explores moral leadership as a possible response to the stigma of such dirty leadership. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 consultant managers and with each one of their juniors, and found that managers put several pressures on their juniors; these pressures bring high levels of stress, lowered wellbeing and burnout. Society considers such a pressuring leadership style morally dirty. To counteract the experience of being seen as morally dirty, we found that consultant managers were normalizing such criticisms as commonly assumed in dirty work literature. However, they also employed several moral leadership tactics to counteract the negative consequences criticized in society. However, in addition to the well-known individual-level tactics, consultant managers and their juniors also reported moral leadership support at the organizational level, like institutionalized performance talks after every project, trainings, specific criteria for hiring juniors, and policies to recognize and compliment high performance. Still, we cannot conclude these moral leadership approaches are moral by definition. They can be used in an instrumental way as well, to further push performance.

AB - Professional service firms in Western Europe have a reputation for putting huge pressures on their junior employees, resulting in very long work hours, and as a consequence health risks. This study explores moral leadership as a possible response to the stigma of such dirty leadership. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 consultant managers and with each one of their juniors, and found that managers put several pressures on their juniors; these pressures bring high levels of stress, lowered wellbeing and burnout. Society considers such a pressuring leadership style morally dirty. To counteract the experience of being seen as morally dirty, we found that consultant managers were normalizing such criticisms as commonly assumed in dirty work literature. However, they also employed several moral leadership tactics to counteract the negative consequences criticized in society. However, in addition to the well-known individual-level tactics, consultant managers and their juniors also reported moral leadership support at the organizational level, like institutionalized performance talks after every project, trainings, specific criteria for hiring juniors, and policies to recognize and compliment high performance. Still, we cannot conclude these moral leadership approaches are moral by definition. They can be used in an instrumental way as well, to further push performance.

KW - dirty work

KW - management consulting

KW - moral leadership

KW - taint normalization

KW - work organization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056514879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056514879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/ijerph15112506

DO - 10.3390/ijerph15112506

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 1

EP - 22

JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

SN - 1660-4601

IS - 11

M1 - 2506

ER -