More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture

Michel Failing*, Jan Theeuwes

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Salient yet irrelevant objects often interfere with daily tasks by capturing attention against our best interests and intentions. Recent research has shown that through implicit learning, distraction by a salient object can be reduced by suppressing the location where this distractor is likely to appear. Here, we investigated whether suppression of such high-probability distractor locations is an all-or-none phenomenon or specifically tuned to the degree of interference caused by the distractor. In two experiments, we varied the salience of two task-irrelevant singleton distractors each of which was more likely to appear in one specific location in the visual field. We show that the magnitude of interference by a distractor determines the magnitude of suppression for its high-probability location: The more salient a distractor, the more it becomes suppressed when appearing in its high-probability location. We conclude that distractor suppression emerges as a consequence of the spatial regularities regarding the location of a distractor as well as its potency to interfere with attentional selection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)86-95
Number of pages10
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume27
Issue number1
Early online date17 Dec 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2020

Funding

We would like to thank Tobias Feldmann‐Wüstefeld for insightful comments. This research was supported by funding of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this