More family responsibility, more informal care? The effect of motivation on the giving of informal care by people aged over 50 in the Netherlands compared to other European countries

Debbie Oudijk*, Isolde Woittiez, Alice de Boer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Against the backdrop of ongoing population ageing, informal care occupies an important place on European political agendas. This article discusses informal caregiving by middle aged and older persons in the Netherlands and other European countries, with particular emphasis on the role played by motives. The data are drawn from SHARE. Our results show that in the Netherlands, it is mainly feelings of being needed and obligation that increase the chance of informal care being given. Deriving pleasure from an activity, by contrast, reduces the likelihood. In Southern Europe, where the responsibility for providing care lies with the family, we found that, contrary to expectations, older carers do not more often feel obliged. They less often report that they feel needed or see being socially active as a way of contributing to society. Our simulations suggest that if the socially active Dutch had the same motives as their Southern European counterparts and behaved similarly in terms of informal caregiving, the number of informal carers would fall. This implies that a greater policy emphasis on family responsibility could actually bring about a decline in the amount of care given, as opposed to the envisaged increase.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)228-235
Number of pages8
JournalHealth Policy
Volume101
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2011

Keywords

  • Elderly
  • Informal care
  • Logit model
  • Motivation
  • SHARE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'More family responsibility, more informal care? The effect of motivation on the giving of informal care by people aged over 50 in the Netherlands compared to other European countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this