Motor control changes in low back pain: Divergence in presentations and mechanisms

Jaap H. Van Dieën, N. Peter Reeves, Greg Kawchuk, Linda R. Van Dillen, Paul W. Hodges

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

patients with low back pain demonstrate differences in all aspects of trunk motor control that are most often studied as differences in muscle activity and kinematics. However, differences in these aspects of motor control are largely inconsistent. We propose that this may reflect the existence of 2 phenotypes or possibly the ends of a spectrum, with “tight control” over trunk movement at one end and “loose control” at the other. Both may have beneficial effects, with tight control protecting against large tissue strains from uncontrolled movement and loose control protecting against high muscle forces and resulting spinal compression. Both may also have long-term negative consequences. For example, whereas tight control may cause high compressive loading on the spine and sustained muscle activity, loose control may cause excessive tensile strains of tissues. Moreover, both phenotypes could be the result of either an adaptation process aimed at protecting the low back or direct interference of low back pain and related changes with trunk motor control. The existence of such phenotypes would suggest different motor control exercise interventions. Although some promising data supporting these phenotypes have been reported, it remains to be shown whether these phenotypes are valid, how treatment can be targeted to these phenotypes, and whether this targeting yields superior clinical outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)370-379
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
Volume49
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Low Back Pain
Phenotype
Muscles
Biomechanical Phenomena
Spine
Exercise

Keywords

  • Back pain
  • Exercise
  • Postural control
  • Spine
  • Subgrouping

Cite this

Van Dieën, Jaap H. ; Peter Reeves, N. ; Kawchuk, Greg ; Van Dillen, Linda R. ; Hodges, Paul W. / Motor control changes in low back pain : Divergence in presentations and mechanisms. In: Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 2019 ; Vol. 49, No. 6. pp. 370-379.
@article{9e9f850427e846c0bac8810a59d31f3b,
title = "Motor control changes in low back pain: Divergence in presentations and mechanisms",
abstract = "patients with low back pain demonstrate differences in all aspects of trunk motor control that are most often studied as differences in muscle activity and kinematics. However, differences in these aspects of motor control are largely inconsistent. We propose that this may reflect the existence of 2 phenotypes or possibly the ends of a spectrum, with “tight control” over trunk movement at one end and “loose control” at the other. Both may have beneficial effects, with tight control protecting against large tissue strains from uncontrolled movement and loose control protecting against high muscle forces and resulting spinal compression. Both may also have long-term negative consequences. For example, whereas tight control may cause high compressive loading on the spine and sustained muscle activity, loose control may cause excessive tensile strains of tissues. Moreover, both phenotypes could be the result of either an adaptation process aimed at protecting the low back or direct interference of low back pain and related changes with trunk motor control. The existence of such phenotypes would suggest different motor control exercise interventions. Although some promising data supporting these phenotypes have been reported, it remains to be shown whether these phenotypes are valid, how treatment can be targeted to these phenotypes, and whether this targeting yields superior clinical outcomes.",
keywords = "Back pain, Exercise, Postural control, Spine, Subgrouping",
author = "{Van Die{\"e}n}, {Jaap H.} and {Peter Reeves}, N. and Greg Kawchuk and {Van Dillen}, {Linda R.} and Hodges, {Paul W.}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2519/jospt.2019.7917",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "370--379",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy",
issn = "0190-6011",
publisher = "JOSPT",
number = "6",

}

Motor control changes in low back pain : Divergence in presentations and mechanisms. / Van Dieën, Jaap H.; Peter Reeves, N.; Kawchuk, Greg; Van Dillen, Linda R.; Hodges, Paul W.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, Vol. 49, No. 6, 01.06.2019, p. 370-379.

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motor control changes in low back pain

T2 - Divergence in presentations and mechanisms

AU - Van Dieën, Jaap H.

AU - Peter Reeves, N.

AU - Kawchuk, Greg

AU - Van Dillen, Linda R.

AU - Hodges, Paul W.

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - patients with low back pain demonstrate differences in all aspects of trunk motor control that are most often studied as differences in muscle activity and kinematics. However, differences in these aspects of motor control are largely inconsistent. We propose that this may reflect the existence of 2 phenotypes or possibly the ends of a spectrum, with “tight control” over trunk movement at one end and “loose control” at the other. Both may have beneficial effects, with tight control protecting against large tissue strains from uncontrolled movement and loose control protecting against high muscle forces and resulting spinal compression. Both may also have long-term negative consequences. For example, whereas tight control may cause high compressive loading on the spine and sustained muscle activity, loose control may cause excessive tensile strains of tissues. Moreover, both phenotypes could be the result of either an adaptation process aimed at protecting the low back or direct interference of low back pain and related changes with trunk motor control. The existence of such phenotypes would suggest different motor control exercise interventions. Although some promising data supporting these phenotypes have been reported, it remains to be shown whether these phenotypes are valid, how treatment can be targeted to these phenotypes, and whether this targeting yields superior clinical outcomes.

AB - patients with low back pain demonstrate differences in all aspects of trunk motor control that are most often studied as differences in muscle activity and kinematics. However, differences in these aspects of motor control are largely inconsistent. We propose that this may reflect the existence of 2 phenotypes or possibly the ends of a spectrum, with “tight control” over trunk movement at one end and “loose control” at the other. Both may have beneficial effects, with tight control protecting against large tissue strains from uncontrolled movement and loose control protecting against high muscle forces and resulting spinal compression. Both may also have long-term negative consequences. For example, whereas tight control may cause high compressive loading on the spine and sustained muscle activity, loose control may cause excessive tensile strains of tissues. Moreover, both phenotypes could be the result of either an adaptation process aimed at protecting the low back or direct interference of low back pain and related changes with trunk motor control. The existence of such phenotypes would suggest different motor control exercise interventions. Although some promising data supporting these phenotypes have been reported, it remains to be shown whether these phenotypes are valid, how treatment can be targeted to these phenotypes, and whether this targeting yields superior clinical outcomes.

KW - Back pain

KW - Exercise

KW - Postural control

KW - Spine

KW - Subgrouping

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066438734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066438734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2519/jospt.2019.7917

DO - 10.2519/jospt.2019.7917

M3 - Review article

VL - 49

SP - 370

EP - 379

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy

SN - 0190-6011

IS - 6

ER -