Moving Beyond Semantics on Autonomous Weapons: Meaningful Human Control in Operation

M.A.C. Ekelhof

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Ongoing discussions about autonomous weapons typically share concerns of losing control and the potentially destabilizing consequences for global security. To the extent that there is any consensus among states, academics, NGOs and other commentators involved in diplomatic efforts under the auspices of the UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, it is grounded in the idea that all weapons should be subject to meaningful human control. This intuitively appealing concept immediately gained traction, although at a familiar legal-political cost: nobody knows what the concept actually means in practice. Although global discourses on policy and governance are typically infused with ambiguity, abstract concepts are of little use if they ignore the operational context that confronts the military in their application. This article places this intuitively appealing concept in context, and thus examines it in operational practice. Paying attention to this military practice is important as it demonstrates that meaningful human control is not the only, or the best, approach through which to characterize the human role and govern the challenges raised by autonomous weapons.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages7
JournalGlobal Policy
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

weapon
semantics
conventional weapon
Military
UN Convention
nongovernmental organization
non-governmental organization
governance
discourse
costs
cost

Cite this

@article{97c44e2e2667495c9b30a0a023b85113,
title = "Moving Beyond Semantics on Autonomous Weapons: Meaningful Human Control in Operation",
abstract = "Ongoing discussions about autonomous weapons typically share concerns of losing control and the potentially destabilizing consequences for global security. To the extent that there is any consensus among states, academics, NGOs and other commentators involved in diplomatic efforts under the auspices of the UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, it is grounded in the idea that all weapons should be subject to meaningful human control. This intuitively appealing concept immediately gained traction, although at a familiar legal-political cost: nobody knows what the concept actually means in practice. Although global discourses on policy and governance are typically infused with ambiguity, abstract concepts are of little use if they ignore the operational context that confronts the military in their application. This article places this intuitively appealing concept in context, and thus examines it in operational practice. Paying attention to this military practice is important as it demonstrates that meaningful human control is not the only, or the best, approach through which to characterize the human role and govern the challenges raised by autonomous weapons.",
author = "M.A.C. Ekelhof",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1111/1758-5899.12665",
language = "English",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Global Policy",
issn = "1758-5880",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

}

Moving Beyond Semantics on Autonomous Weapons: Meaningful Human Control in Operation. / Ekelhof, M.A.C.

In: Global Policy, 19.03.2019, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moving Beyond Semantics on Autonomous Weapons: Meaningful Human Control in Operation

AU - Ekelhof, M.A.C.

PY - 2019/3/19

Y1 - 2019/3/19

N2 - Ongoing discussions about autonomous weapons typically share concerns of losing control and the potentially destabilizing consequences for global security. To the extent that there is any consensus among states, academics, NGOs and other commentators involved in diplomatic efforts under the auspices of the UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, it is grounded in the idea that all weapons should be subject to meaningful human control. This intuitively appealing concept immediately gained traction, although at a familiar legal-political cost: nobody knows what the concept actually means in practice. Although global discourses on policy and governance are typically infused with ambiguity, abstract concepts are of little use if they ignore the operational context that confronts the military in their application. This article places this intuitively appealing concept in context, and thus examines it in operational practice. Paying attention to this military practice is important as it demonstrates that meaningful human control is not the only, or the best, approach through which to characterize the human role and govern the challenges raised by autonomous weapons.

AB - Ongoing discussions about autonomous weapons typically share concerns of losing control and the potentially destabilizing consequences for global security. To the extent that there is any consensus among states, academics, NGOs and other commentators involved in diplomatic efforts under the auspices of the UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, it is grounded in the idea that all weapons should be subject to meaningful human control. This intuitively appealing concept immediately gained traction, although at a familiar legal-political cost: nobody knows what the concept actually means in practice. Although global discourses on policy and governance are typically infused with ambiguity, abstract concepts are of little use if they ignore the operational context that confronts the military in their application. This article places this intuitively appealing concept in context, and thus examines it in operational practice. Paying attention to this military practice is important as it demonstrates that meaningful human control is not the only, or the best, approach through which to characterize the human role and govern the challenges raised by autonomous weapons.

UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.12665

U2 - 10.1111/1758-5899.12665

DO - 10.1111/1758-5899.12665

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Global Policy

JF - Global Policy

SN - 1758-5880

ER -