Multi-agency approaches in 'criminogenic' settings: the case of the Amsterdam Red Light District

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper assesses the empirical evidence on multi-agency collaboration to reduce crime, uphold justice and improve safety in the so-called ‘Red Light District’ in the city center of Amsterdam, which has been a high crime area for decades. Three periods are analyzed: crime on the streets (1980s–1996); organized crime behind the front doors (1996–2007); and reconquering the Red Light District (2007–2011). The paper analyzes shifts in the definition and framing of central crime problems, causal assumptions, policy assumptions, and evidence on multi-agency collaboration and outcomes. Alongside positive outcomes, all three periods contain evidence on how difficult it is to forge and sustain alliances between government agencies; and to coordinate a shared focus on a single area and on a single topic. Furthermore, the final outcomes of these efforts are hard to measure with the exception of visible street crime. Finally, the paper contributes to the literature on Third Party Policing and multi-agency collaboration by looking beyond the police as the central actor and by widening the predominant instrumental focus to normative and political issues such as changing norms, priorities, and increasing and decreasing internal and external support for certain policy lines and actions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)247-261
JournalCrime, Law and Social Change
Volume64
Issue number4-5
Early online date24 Oct 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Crime
offense
evidence
organized crime
Government Agencies
government agency
city center
Social Justice
Police
police
justice
Safety

Cite this

@article{c6b8c728ed5b4094b8a08d22d8a25c0b,
title = "Multi-agency approaches in 'criminogenic' settings: the case of the Amsterdam Red Light District",
abstract = "This paper assesses the empirical evidence on multi-agency collaboration to reduce crime, uphold justice and improve safety in the so-called ‘Red Light District’ in the city center of Amsterdam, which has been a high crime area for decades. Three periods are analyzed: crime on the streets (1980s–1996); organized crime behind the front doors (1996–2007); and reconquering the Red Light District (2007–2011). The paper analyzes shifts in the definition and framing of central crime problems, causal assumptions, policy assumptions, and evidence on multi-agency collaboration and outcomes. Alongside positive outcomes, all three periods contain evidence on how difficult it is to forge and sustain alliances between government agencies; and to coordinate a shared focus on a single area and on a single topic. Furthermore, the final outcomes of these efforts are hard to measure with the exception of visible street crime. Finally, the paper contributes to the literature on Third Party Policing and multi-agency collaboration by looking beyond the police as the central actor and by widening the predominant instrumental focus to normative and political issues such as changing norms, priorities, and increasing and decreasing internal and external support for certain policy lines and actions.",
author = "E.R. Kleemans and W. Huisman",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/s10611-015-9590-6",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "247--261",
journal = "Crime, Law and Social Change",
issn = "0925-4994",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4-5",

}

Multi-agency approaches in 'criminogenic' settings: the case of the Amsterdam Red Light District. / Kleemans, E.R.; Huisman, W.

In: Crime, Law and Social Change, Vol. 64, No. 4-5, 2015, p. 247-261.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multi-agency approaches in 'criminogenic' settings: the case of the Amsterdam Red Light District

AU - Kleemans, E.R.

AU - Huisman, W.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This paper assesses the empirical evidence on multi-agency collaboration to reduce crime, uphold justice and improve safety in the so-called ‘Red Light District’ in the city center of Amsterdam, which has been a high crime area for decades. Three periods are analyzed: crime on the streets (1980s–1996); organized crime behind the front doors (1996–2007); and reconquering the Red Light District (2007–2011). The paper analyzes shifts in the definition and framing of central crime problems, causal assumptions, policy assumptions, and evidence on multi-agency collaboration and outcomes. Alongside positive outcomes, all three periods contain evidence on how difficult it is to forge and sustain alliances between government agencies; and to coordinate a shared focus on a single area and on a single topic. Furthermore, the final outcomes of these efforts are hard to measure with the exception of visible street crime. Finally, the paper contributes to the literature on Third Party Policing and multi-agency collaboration by looking beyond the police as the central actor and by widening the predominant instrumental focus to normative and political issues such as changing norms, priorities, and increasing and decreasing internal and external support for certain policy lines and actions.

AB - This paper assesses the empirical evidence on multi-agency collaboration to reduce crime, uphold justice and improve safety in the so-called ‘Red Light District’ in the city center of Amsterdam, which has been a high crime area for decades. Three periods are analyzed: crime on the streets (1980s–1996); organized crime behind the front doors (1996–2007); and reconquering the Red Light District (2007–2011). The paper analyzes shifts in the definition and framing of central crime problems, causal assumptions, policy assumptions, and evidence on multi-agency collaboration and outcomes. Alongside positive outcomes, all three periods contain evidence on how difficult it is to forge and sustain alliances between government agencies; and to coordinate a shared focus on a single area and on a single topic. Furthermore, the final outcomes of these efforts are hard to measure with the exception of visible street crime. Finally, the paper contributes to the literature on Third Party Policing and multi-agency collaboration by looking beyond the police as the central actor and by widening the predominant instrumental focus to normative and political issues such as changing norms, priorities, and increasing and decreasing internal and external support for certain policy lines and actions.

U2 - 10.1007/s10611-015-9590-6

DO - 10.1007/s10611-015-9590-6

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 247

EP - 261

JO - Crime, Law and Social Change

JF - Crime, Law and Social Change

SN - 0925-4994

IS - 4-5

ER -