Multi-rater feedback methods: Personal and organizational implications

Paul Jansen, Daniël Vloeberghs

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The conditions and implications for the use of multi-rater feedback or “360-degree” methods are studied from both a psychological and an organizational perspective. Psychological research indicates that multi-ratings cannot be put on the same footing as ratings obtained from more “objective” sources as for instance the assessment center. Multi-rater feedback can be interpreted either as standing in the tradition of assessment centers, or originating from “total quality management”, but it seems more congenial to the TQM method of organizing “customer feedback”. Since multi-rater feedback presupposes social interaction and consequently a work organization, the communicative conditions for such a feedback system are subsequently investigated from the perspective of organization science. It is investigated how various structural and cultural changes offer a fertile soil for the introduction of such kinds of feedback. However, the authors warn of the terror of “total feedback”.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)455-476
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Managerial Psychology
Volume14
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 1999

Keywords

  • Assessment centres
  • Corporate communications
  • Feedback
  • Total Quality Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multi-rater feedback methods: Personal and organizational implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this