Multiple legitimacy narratives and planned organizational change

Dana Landau, Israel Drori, Siri Terjesen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article explores the cultural narratives through which members of organizations define legitimacy during prolonged periods of change. We view legitimacy work as a cultural practice and interpretive process that takes the form of organizational narratives. We show how the shifting configurations of internal power relations shape both the choice and the meaning attached to the varied legitimacy narratives. We investigate the construction of legitimacy through a longitudinal case study based on participant observation of Gamma, a government Research and Development (R&D) organization, during a process of intense change. We provide theoretical insights into the construction and deconstruction of the legitimacy by analyzing the narratives in play during a process of planned change. We claim that legitimation narratives not only evolve in accordance with functional need or, in a sense, that older narratives give room to newer, more updated or relevant narratives, but also that multiple narratives are used by different organization actors alternately and interchangeably as part of internal contestation over legitimation of change.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1321-1345
Number of pages25
JournalHuman Relations
Volume67
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Nov 2014

Keywords

  • conflict
  • employee voice
  • ethnography
  • identity
  • narrative
  • organizational culture

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multiple legitimacy narratives and planned organizational change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this