Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Multivalent CXCR4-targeting nanobody formats differently affect affinity, receptor clustering, and antagonism

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The chemokine receptor CXCR4 is involved in the development and migration of stem and immune cells but is also implicated in tumor progression and metastasis for a variety of cancers. Antagonizing ligand (CXCL12)-induced CXCR4 signaling is, therefore, of therapeutic interest. Currently, there are two small-molecule CXCR4 antagonists on the market for the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells. Other molecules with improved potencies and safety profiles are being developed for different indications, including cancer. Moreover, multiple antagonistic nanobodies targeting CXCR4 displayed similar or better potencies as compared to the CXCR4-targeting molecule AMD3100 (Plerixafor), which was further enhanced through avid binding of bivalent derivatives. In this study, we aimed to compare the affinities of various multivalent nanobody formats which might be differently impacted by avidity. By fusion to a flexible GS-linker, Fc-region of human IgG1, different C4bp/CLR multimerization domains, or via site-directed conjugation to a trivalent linker scaffold, we generated different types of multivalent nanobodies with varying valencies ranging from bivalent to decavalent. Of these, C-terminal fusion, especially to human Fc, was most advantageous with a 2-log-fold and 3-log-fold increased potency in inhibiting CXCL12-mediated Gαi- or β-arrestin recruitment, respectively. Overall, we describe strategies for generating multivalent and high-potency CXCR4 antagonistic nanobodies able to induce receptor clustering and conclude that fusion to an Fc-tail results in the highest avidity effect irrespective of the hinge linker.

Original languageEnglish
Article number116457
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalBiochemical Pharmacology
Volume227
Early online date3 Aug 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors

Funding

This work was funded by European Union ’s Horizon2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) Program under Grant Agreement 860229 ( ONCORNET2 .0) for S.M.A. Health Holland/Aidsfonds LSHM19101/P-44802 and Health Holland /AMC 2019-1167 funded the work for A.I.S. and S.W.T. respectively. Funding for T.N.G. and S.N. was provided by the European Research Council (ERC) proof-of-concept 839088 and EU Commission in the framework of the Horizon Europe – EIC Transition Open program 101057978 respectively. This work was funded by European Union's Horizon2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) Program under Grant Agreement 860229 (ONCORNET2.0) for S.M.A. Health Holland/Aidsfonds LSHM19101/P-44802 and Health Holland/AMC 2019-1167 funded the work for A.I.S. and S.W.T. respectively. Funding for T.N.G. and S.N. was provided by the European Research Council (ERC) proof-of-concept 839088 and EU Commission in the framework of the Horizon Europe – EIC Transition Open program 101057978 respectively.

FundersFunder number
European Union ’s Horizon2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
European Commission
European Union's Horizon2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsONCORNET2 .0, LSHM19101/P-44802, 860229
European Research Council839088
Health Holland/AMC 2019-1167

    Keywords

    • Affinity
    • Avidity
    • CXCR4
    • Multivalency
    • Nanobody
    • Nanobody-Fc

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Multivalent CXCR4-targeting nanobody formats differently affect affinity, receptor clustering, and antagonism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this