Municipalities' contracting out decisions: An empirical study on motives

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Municipalities have various motives behind their decisions about the modes of their task execution. Empirical studies have not yet provided a fully satisfying explanation for municipalities' contracting out decisions. Therefore, we interviewed several Dutch principal municipal managers to evaluate the causes and motives for the choices ofthe current structures for the delivery oftheir services. This study investigates the relevance of common public choice and transaction cost motives on contracting out and explores the relevance of additional institutional and pragmatic motives. We found that municipalities do not regularly evaluate the service provision of their activities and the potential benefits of outsourcing. In fact, if the activity has an adequate performance level and complaints from municipal employees, local politicians or inhabitants do not occur, a catalyst for a discussion on the contracting out of this activity is, in general, lacking. Principally in the case ofstructural underperformance municipalities consider a change ofservice provider, and then the efficiency motive is most relevant. Thereby, institutional motives - such as the stability of service provision - and pragmatic motives are also relevant. Institutional pressures in particular initiate the evaluation oforganisational performance, whereas both economic motives as institutional and pragmatic motives are used to compare alternative service providers.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPublic-Private Partnerships
Subtitle of host publicationInfrastructure, Transportation and Local Services
EditorsG. Bel, T. Brown, R. Cunha Marques
PublisherTaylor and Francis Inc.
Pages112-132
Number of pages21
ISBN (Electronic)9781317574361
ISBN (Print)9781138827424
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

municipality
pragmatics
local politician
public choice
outsourcing
transaction costs
complaint
service provider
inhabitant
performance
employee
manager
efficiency
cause
evaluation
economics

Cite this

Wassenaar, M., Groot, T., & Gradus, R. (2016). Municipalities' contracting out decisions: An empirical study on motives. In G. Bel, T. Brown, & R. Cunha Marques (Eds.), Public-Private Partnerships: Infrastructure, Transportation and Local Services (pp. 112-132). Taylor and Francis Inc.. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315738659
Wassenaar, Mattheus ; Groot, Tom ; Gradus, Raymond. / Municipalities' contracting out decisions : An empirical study on motives. Public-Private Partnerships: Infrastructure, Transportation and Local Services. editor / G. Bel ; T. Brown ; R. Cunha Marques. Taylor and Francis Inc., 2016. pp. 112-132
@inbook{d23c4f3b0917445687d33a883ee0d73b,
title = "Municipalities' contracting out decisions: An empirical study on motives",
abstract = "Municipalities have various motives behind their decisions about the modes of their task execution. Empirical studies have not yet provided a fully satisfying explanation for municipalities' contracting out decisions. Therefore, we interviewed several Dutch principal municipal managers to evaluate the causes and motives for the choices ofthe current structures for the delivery oftheir services. This study investigates the relevance of common public choice and transaction cost motives on contracting out and explores the relevance of additional institutional and pragmatic motives. We found that municipalities do not regularly evaluate the service provision of their activities and the potential benefits of outsourcing. In fact, if the activity has an adequate performance level and complaints from municipal employees, local politicians or inhabitants do not occur, a catalyst for a discussion on the contracting out of this activity is, in general, lacking. Principally in the case ofstructural underperformance municipalities consider a change ofservice provider, and then the efficiency motive is most relevant. Thereby, institutional motives - such as the stability of service provision - and pragmatic motives are also relevant. Institutional pressures in particular initiate the evaluation oforganisational performance, whereas both economic motives as institutional and pragmatic motives are used to compare alternative service providers.",
author = "Mattheus Wassenaar and Tom Groot and Raymond Gradus",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "14",
doi = "10.4324/9781315738659",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138827424",
pages = "112--132",
editor = "G. Bel and T. Brown and {Cunha Marques}, R.",
booktitle = "Public-Private Partnerships",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Inc.",

}

Wassenaar, M, Groot, T & Gradus, R 2016, Municipalities' contracting out decisions: An empirical study on motives. in G Bel, T Brown & R Cunha Marques (eds), Public-Private Partnerships: Infrastructure, Transportation and Local Services. Taylor and Francis Inc., pp. 112-132. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315738659

Municipalities' contracting out decisions : An empirical study on motives. / Wassenaar, Mattheus; Groot, Tom; Gradus, Raymond.

Public-Private Partnerships: Infrastructure, Transportation and Local Services. ed. / G. Bel; T. Brown; R. Cunha Marques. Taylor and Francis Inc., 2016. p. 112-132.

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Municipalities' contracting out decisions

T2 - An empirical study on motives

AU - Wassenaar, Mattheus

AU - Groot, Tom

AU - Gradus, Raymond

PY - 2016/4/14

Y1 - 2016/4/14

N2 - Municipalities have various motives behind their decisions about the modes of their task execution. Empirical studies have not yet provided a fully satisfying explanation for municipalities' contracting out decisions. Therefore, we interviewed several Dutch principal municipal managers to evaluate the causes and motives for the choices ofthe current structures for the delivery oftheir services. This study investigates the relevance of common public choice and transaction cost motives on contracting out and explores the relevance of additional institutional and pragmatic motives. We found that municipalities do not regularly evaluate the service provision of their activities and the potential benefits of outsourcing. In fact, if the activity has an adequate performance level and complaints from municipal employees, local politicians or inhabitants do not occur, a catalyst for a discussion on the contracting out of this activity is, in general, lacking. Principally in the case ofstructural underperformance municipalities consider a change ofservice provider, and then the efficiency motive is most relevant. Thereby, institutional motives - such as the stability of service provision - and pragmatic motives are also relevant. Institutional pressures in particular initiate the evaluation oforganisational performance, whereas both economic motives as institutional and pragmatic motives are used to compare alternative service providers.

AB - Municipalities have various motives behind their decisions about the modes of their task execution. Empirical studies have not yet provided a fully satisfying explanation for municipalities' contracting out decisions. Therefore, we interviewed several Dutch principal municipal managers to evaluate the causes and motives for the choices ofthe current structures for the delivery oftheir services. This study investigates the relevance of common public choice and transaction cost motives on contracting out and explores the relevance of additional institutional and pragmatic motives. We found that municipalities do not regularly evaluate the service provision of their activities and the potential benefits of outsourcing. In fact, if the activity has an adequate performance level and complaints from municipal employees, local politicians or inhabitants do not occur, a catalyst for a discussion on the contracting out of this activity is, in general, lacking. Principally in the case ofstructural underperformance municipalities consider a change ofservice provider, and then the efficiency motive is most relevant. Thereby, institutional motives - such as the stability of service provision - and pragmatic motives are also relevant. Institutional pressures in particular initiate the evaluation oforganisational performance, whereas both economic motives as institutional and pragmatic motives are used to compare alternative service providers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978444398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978444398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315738659

DO - 10.4324/9781315738659

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781138827424

SP - 112

EP - 132

BT - Public-Private Partnerships

A2 - Bel, G.

A2 - Brown, T.

A2 - Cunha Marques, R.

PB - Taylor and Francis Inc.

ER -

Wassenaar M, Groot T, Gradus R. Municipalities' contracting out decisions: An empirical study on motives. In Bel G, Brown T, Cunha Marques R, editors, Public-Private Partnerships: Infrastructure, Transportation and Local Services. Taylor and Francis Inc. 2016. p. 112-132 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315738659