Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Mutual suspicion at the political extremes: How ideology predicts conspiracy beliefs

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In the present chapter, we examine how conspiracy beliefs, as well as other suspicious political perceptions, are related to political ideology. Based on a review of the literature as well as recent findings, we propose that although some conspiracy theories are mostly endorsed by the political “left” (e.g., conspiracy theories about capitalism), and others by the political “right” (e.g., conspiracy theories about climate change), people’s underlying susceptibility to conspiracy beliefs is best predicted by political extremism or moderation. Various recent findings indeed reveal a curvilinear relation between ideology and conspiracy beliefs, consistently indicating a stronger endorsement of conspiracy theories at both extremes than in the political centre. Moreover, political extremism also predicts related suspicious political perceptions, such as generalized distrust towards politicians, and EU skepticism. When looking specifically at party affiliation in a Dutch multi-party context, these suspicious beliefs flourish particularly among those who support socialist left and the populist right. It is concluded that political extremism is closely associated with political paranoia.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Psychology of Conspiracy
EditorsM. Bilewicz, A. Cichocka, W. Soral
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Pages79-99
Number of pages20
ISBN (Print)9781138815209
Publication statusPublished - 2015

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mutual suspicion at the political extremes: How ideology predicts conspiracy beliefs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this