Abstract
Much information people receive about others reaches them via gossip. But is this gossip trustworthy? We examined this in a scenario study (Nsenders = 350, Nobservations = 700) and an interactive laboratory experiment (Nsenders = 126; Nobservations = 3024). In both studies, participants played a sequential prisoner’s dilemma where a gossip sender observed a target’s (first decider’s) decision and could gossip about this to a receiver (second decider). We manipulated the interdependence structure such that gossipers’ outcomes were equal to targets’ outcomes, equal to receivers’ outcomes, or independent. Compared to no interdependence, gossip was more often false when gossipers were interdependent with targets but not when interdependent with receivers. As such, false positive gossip (self-serving when interdependent with targets) increased but false negative gossip (self-serving when interdependent with receivers) did not. In conclusion, the interdependence structure affected gossip’s trustworthiness: When gossipers’ outcomes were interdependent with targets, gossip was less trustworthy.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1596-1612 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin |
Volume | 50 |
Issue number | 11 |
Early online date | 25 May 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This paper was supported by an ERC Consolidator Grant (#771391) awarded to Bianca Beersma.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This paper was supported by an ERC Consolidator Grant (#771391) awarded to Bianca Beersma.
Keywords
- gossip
- interdependence
- proself
- prosocial
- trustworthiness