Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein levels in metachromatic leukodystrophy

  • Shanice Beerepoot
  • , Hans Heijst
  • , Birthe Roos
  • , Mirjam M.C. Wamelink
  • , Jaap Jan Boelens
  • , Caroline A. Lindemans
  • , Peter M. Van Hasselt
  • , Edwin H. Jacobs
  • , Marjo S. Van Der Knaap
  • , Charlotte E. Teunissen
  • , Nicole I. Wolf*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Metachromatic leukodystrophy is a lethal metabolic leukodystrophy, with emerging treatments for early disease stages. Biomarkers to measure disease activity are required for clinical assessment and treatment follow-up. This retrospective study compared neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels in CSF (n = 11) and blood (n = 92) samples of 40 patients with metachromatic leukodystrophy (aged 0-42 years) with 38 neurologically healthy children (aged 0-17 years) and 38 healthy adults (aged 18-45 years), and analysed the associations between these levels with clinical phenotype and disease evolution in untreated and transplanted patients. Metachromatic leukodystrophy subtype was determined based on the (expected) age of symptom onset. Disease activity was assessed by measuring gross motor function deterioration and brain MRI. Longitudinal analyses with measurements up to 23 years after diagnosis were performed using linear mixed models. CSF and blood neurofilament light chain and GFAP levels in paediatric controls were negatively associated with age (all P < 0.001). Blood neurofilament light chain level at diagnosis (median, interquartile range; picograms per millilitre) was significantly increased in both presymptomatic (14.7, 10.6-56.7) and symptomatic patients (136, 40.8-445) compared to controls (5.6, 4.5-7.1), and highest among patients with late-infantile (456, 201-854) or early-juvenile metachromatic leukodystrophy (291.0, 104-445) and those ineligible for treatment based on best practice (291, 57.4-472). GFAP level (median, interquartile range; picogram per millilitre) was only increased in symptomatic patients (591, 224-1150) compared to controls (119, 78.2-338) and not significantly associated with treatment eligibility (P = 0.093). Higher blood neurofilament light chain and GFAP levels at diagnosis were associated with rapid disease progression in late-infantile (P = 0.006 and P = 0.051, respectively) and early-juvenile patients (P = 0.048 and P = 0.039, respectively). Finally, blood neurofilament light chain and GFAP levels decreased during follow-up in untreated and transplanted patients but remained elevated compared with controls. Only neurofilament light chain levels were associated with MRI deterioration (P < 0.001). This study indicates that both proteins may be considered as non-invasive biomarkers for clinical phenotype and disease stage at clinical assessment, and that neurofilament light chain might enable neurologists to make better informed treatment decisions. In addition, neurofilament light chain holds promise assessing treatment response. Importantly, both biomarkers require paediatric reference values, given that their levels first decrease before increasing with advancing age.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-118
Number of pages14
JournalBrain
Volume145
Issue number1
Early online date16 Aug 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This study was partially funded by the Dutch charity organization Metakids (Metakids: 2017 073 to N.I.W. and J.J.B.). In addition, research by C.E.T. was supported by the European Commission [Marie Curie International Training Network, grant agreement no, 860197 (MIRIADE) and JPND], Health Holland, the Dutch Research Council (ZonMW), Alzheimer Drug Discovery Foundation, The Selfridges Group Foundation, Alzheimer Netherlands and the Alzheimer Association. The funding sources had no role in the design, analyses, reporting of the study or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors of this publication affiliated with the Amsterdam Leukodystrophy Center are members of the European Reference Network for Rare Neurological Diseases Project ID no. 739510. We thank Lynn Boonkamp and Patty Hoede for their help with the GFAP analyses. We are also grateful for the cooperation of all referring hospitals and to Dr Marc Engelen for sharing his NfL and GFAP data of adult controls.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.

Funding

This study was partially funded by the Dutch charity organization Metakids (Metakids: 2017 073 to N.I.W. and J.J.B.). In addition, research by C.E.T. was supported by the European Commission [Marie Curie International Training Network, grant agreement no, 860197 (MIRIADE) and JPND], Health Holland, the Dutch Research Council (ZonMW), Alzheimer Drug Discovery Foundation, The Selfridges Group Foundation, Alzheimer Netherlands and the Alzheimer Association. The funding sources had no role in the design, analyses, reporting of the study or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors of this publication affiliated with the Amsterdam Leukodystrophy Center are members of the European Reference Network for Rare Neurological Diseases Project ID no. 739510. We thank Lynn Boonkamp and Patty Hoede for their help with the GFAP analyses. We are also grateful for the cooperation of all referring hospitals and to Dr Marc Engelen for sharing his NfL and GFAP data of adult controls.

FundersFunder number
Health Holland
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
EU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease Research
European Commission
ZonMw
Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme860197
Dutch charity organization Metakids2017 073
Alzheimer's Association739510
National Cancer InstituteP30CA008748

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • arylsulfatase A
    • biomarker
    • glial fibrillary acidic protein
    • metachromatic leukodystrophy
    • neurofilament light

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein levels in metachromatic leukodystrophy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this