Neuroimaging of learning and development: improving ecological validity

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Modern neuroscience research, including neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), has provided valuable insights that advanced our understanding of brain development and learning processes significantly. However, there is a lively discussion about whether and how these insights can be meaningful to the educational practice. One of the main challenges is the low ecological validity of neuroimaging studies, making it hard to translate neuroimaging findings to real-life learning situations. Here, we describe four approaches that increase the ecological validity of neuroimaging experiments: using more naturalistic stimuli and tasks, moving the research to more naturalistic settings by using portable neuroimaging devices, combining tightly controlled lab-based neuroimaging measurements with real-life variables and follow-up field studies, and including stakeholders from the practice at all stages of the research. We illustrate these approaches with examples and explain how these directions of research optimize the benefits of neuroimaging techniques to study learning anddevelopment. This paper provides a frontline overview of methodological approaches that can be used for future neuroimaging studies to increase their ecological validity and thereby their relevance and applicability to the learning practice.  
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)186-203
Number of pages18
JournalFrontline Learning Research
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Neuroimaging
Learning
Research
Neurosciences
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Equipment and Supplies
Brain

Cite this

@article{9cb4f06d46e54e42a49be34c1dd05b58,
title = "Neuroimaging of learning and development: improving ecological validity",
abstract = "Modern neuroscience research, including neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), has provided valuable insights that advanced our understanding of brain development and learning processes significantly. However, there is a lively discussion about whether and how these insights can be meaningful to the educational practice. One of the main challenges is the low ecological validity of neuroimaging studies, making it hard to translate neuroimaging findings to real-life learning situations. Here, we describe four approaches that increase the ecological validity of neuroimaging experiments: using more naturalistic stimuli and tasks, moving the research to more naturalistic settings by using portable neuroimaging devices, combining tightly controlled lab-based neuroimaging measurements with real-life variables and follow-up field studies, and including stakeholders from the practice at all stages of the research. We illustrate these approaches with examples and explain how these directions of research optimize the benefits of neuroimaging techniques to study learning anddevelopment. This paper provides a frontline overview of methodological approaches that can be used for future neuroimaging studies to increase their ecological validity and thereby their relevance and applicability to the learning practice.  ",
author = "{van Atteveldt}, {Nienke Mari{\"e}lla} and {van Kesteren}, Marlieke and Barbara Braams and Lydia Krabbendam",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "5",
doi = "10.14786/flr.v6i3.366",
language = "English",
pages = "186--203",
journal = "Frontline Learning Research",

}

Neuroimaging of learning and development: improving ecological validity. / van Atteveldt, Nienke Mariëlla; van Kesteren, Marlieke; Braams, Barbara; Krabbendam, Lydia.

In: Frontline Learning Research, 05.04.2019, p. 186-203.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neuroimaging of learning and development: improving ecological validity

AU - van Atteveldt, Nienke Mariëlla

AU - van Kesteren, Marlieke

AU - Braams, Barbara

AU - Krabbendam, Lydia

PY - 2019/4/5

Y1 - 2019/4/5

N2 - Modern neuroscience research, including neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), has provided valuable insights that advanced our understanding of brain development and learning processes significantly. However, there is a lively discussion about whether and how these insights can be meaningful to the educational practice. One of the main challenges is the low ecological validity of neuroimaging studies, making it hard to translate neuroimaging findings to real-life learning situations. Here, we describe four approaches that increase the ecological validity of neuroimaging experiments: using more naturalistic stimuli and tasks, moving the research to more naturalistic settings by using portable neuroimaging devices, combining tightly controlled lab-based neuroimaging measurements with real-life variables and follow-up field studies, and including stakeholders from the practice at all stages of the research. We illustrate these approaches with examples and explain how these directions of research optimize the benefits of neuroimaging techniques to study learning anddevelopment. This paper provides a frontline overview of methodological approaches that can be used for future neuroimaging studies to increase their ecological validity and thereby their relevance and applicability to the learning practice.  

AB - Modern neuroscience research, including neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), has provided valuable insights that advanced our understanding of brain development and learning processes significantly. However, there is a lively discussion about whether and how these insights can be meaningful to the educational practice. One of the main challenges is the low ecological validity of neuroimaging studies, making it hard to translate neuroimaging findings to real-life learning situations. Here, we describe four approaches that increase the ecological validity of neuroimaging experiments: using more naturalistic stimuli and tasks, moving the research to more naturalistic settings by using portable neuroimaging devices, combining tightly controlled lab-based neuroimaging measurements with real-life variables and follow-up field studies, and including stakeholders from the practice at all stages of the research. We illustrate these approaches with examples and explain how these directions of research optimize the benefits of neuroimaging techniques to study learning anddevelopment. This paper provides a frontline overview of methodological approaches that can be used for future neuroimaging studies to increase their ecological validity and thereby their relevance and applicability to the learning practice.  

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/neuroimaging-learning-development-improving-ecological-validity

U2 - 10.14786/flr.v6i3.366

DO - 10.14786/flr.v6i3.366

M3 - Article

SP - 186

EP - 203

JO - Frontline Learning Research

JF - Frontline Learning Research

ER -