TY - JOUR
T1 - New Insight into the Nature of Bonding in the Dimers of Lappert’s Stannylene and Its Ge Analogs
T2 - A Quantum Mechanical Study
AU - Sedlak, R.
AU - Stasyuk, O.A.
AU - Fonseca Guerra, C.
AU - Rezac, J.
AU - Ruzicka, A.
AU - Hobza, P
PY - 2016/3/8
Y1 - 2016/3/8
N2 - The strength and nature of the connection in Lappert’s stannylene dimer ({Sn[CH(SiMe3)2]2}2) and its smaller analogs, simplified stannylenes, as well as similar Ge complexes were studied by means of DFT-D3 calculations, energy decomposition analysis (EDA), electrostatic potential (ESP), and natural population analysis. The trans-bent structure of the investigated molecules was rationalized by means of EDA, ESP, and molecular orbital (MO) analyses. The different ESPs for the monomers studied are a result of different hybridization of the Sn (Ge) atoms. The comparably strong stabilization in the largest and the smallest systems with a dramatically different substituent size is explained by the different nature of the binding between monomers. For all complexes, it has been found that the total attractive interaction is mostly provided by the electrostatic component (>50%), followed by orbital interaction and dispersion. In the largest molecule (Lappert’s stannylene), the dispersion interaction plays a more significant role in stabilization and its magnitude is comparable to that of orbital interaction; on the other hand in the smallest molecule (SnH2), where bulky substituents are replaced by H only, the dispersion energy is less important and the E–E bond is more of a charge-transfer character, caused by donor–acceptor orbital interactions. The charge transfer in Ge dimers is greater than in the Sn ones due to shorter distances between monomers, which cause better ⟨HOMO/LUMO⟩ overlaps. The easier dimerization of Lappert’s stannylene as compared to Kira’s ({Sn[(Me3Si)2CHCH2CH2CH(SiMe3)2-κ2C,C′]}) stannylene is explained by the different orientation of their substituents—asymmetry promotes dimerization.
AB - The strength and nature of the connection in Lappert’s stannylene dimer ({Sn[CH(SiMe3)2]2}2) and its smaller analogs, simplified stannylenes, as well as similar Ge complexes were studied by means of DFT-D3 calculations, energy decomposition analysis (EDA), electrostatic potential (ESP), and natural population analysis. The trans-bent structure of the investigated molecules was rationalized by means of EDA, ESP, and molecular orbital (MO) analyses. The different ESPs for the monomers studied are a result of different hybridization of the Sn (Ge) atoms. The comparably strong stabilization in the largest and the smallest systems with a dramatically different substituent size is explained by the different nature of the binding between monomers. For all complexes, it has been found that the total attractive interaction is mostly provided by the electrostatic component (>50%), followed by orbital interaction and dispersion. In the largest molecule (Lappert’s stannylene), the dispersion interaction plays a more significant role in stabilization and its magnitude is comparable to that of orbital interaction; on the other hand in the smallest molecule (SnH2), where bulky substituents are replaced by H only, the dispersion energy is less important and the E–E bond is more of a charge-transfer character, caused by donor–acceptor orbital interactions. The charge transfer in Ge dimers is greater than in the Sn ones due to shorter distances between monomers, which cause better ⟨HOMO/LUMO⟩ overlaps. The easier dimerization of Lappert’s stannylene as compared to Kira’s ({Sn[(Me3Si)2CHCH2CH2CH(SiMe3)2-κ2C,C′]}) stannylene is explained by the different orientation of their substituents—asymmetry promotes dimerization.
U2 - 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00065
DO - 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00065
M3 - Article
SN - 1549-9618
VL - 12
SP - 1696
EP - 1704
JO - Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
JF - Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
IS - 4
ER -