Abstract
Analytic thinking is reliably associated with lower belief in conspiracy theories. However, evidence for whether increasing analytic thinking can reduce belief in conspiracies is sparse. As an exception to this, Swami et al. (2014) showed that priming analytical thinking through a verbal fluency task (i.e., scrambled sentence task) or a processing fluency manipulation (i.e., difficult-to-read fonts) reduced belief in conspiracy theories. To probe the robustness of these effects, in this Registered Report, we present two highly powered (i.e., 95%) direct replications of two of the original studies (i.e., Studies 2 and 4). We found no evidence that priming analytic thinking through the scrambled sentence task (N = 302), nor the difficult-to-read fonts (N = 488) elicited more analytic thinking, nor reduced belief in conspiracy theories. This work highlights the need for further research to identify effective ways of inducing analytic thinking in order to gauge its potential causal impact on belief in conspiracies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 104549 |
Journal | Journal of Experimental Social Psychology |
Volume | 110 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2024 |
Funding
The authors would like to thank the Kurt Lewin Institute for providing funding for this project through the KLI Seed Money fund.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Kurt Lewin Institute |