Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Noise pollution and artificial light at night alter selection pressures on sexual signals in an urban adapter

  • Andrew D. Cronin*
  • , Rotem Zilber
  • , Paul Jerem
  • , Wouter Halfwerk*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Human-induced environmental changes can have major impacts on how individuals communicate. Species using sexual signals may experience especially rapid shifts in their interactions with both intended receivers (mates) and eavesdroppers (predators). Artificial light at night and anthropogenic noise represent 2 major environmental features of human-dominated habitats which may alter selection pressures imposed on sexual signalers. In this study, we used a full factorial design to investigate individual and combined effects of experimentally added light and noise pollution on the attraction of female frogs and bat predators to speakers broadcasting male túngara frog (Engystomops pustulosus) calls. We conducted 2-choice tests in the field to examine whether predatory and mating preferences for signals differing in conspicuousness change in response to noise and light pollution. Light pollution reduced the number of approaches from predators and mates attracted to our playbacks. The addition of noise pollution enhanced this effect on predators but decreased it for female frogs. Light also lowered female frog preference for conspicuous calls, but this effect was counteracted when noise pollution was added. Reduced numbers of predators and female frogs found under lit conditions suggest light pollution can both reduce natural selection and increase sexual selection pressures on male signals. These findings indicate that light pollution could be responsible for the reduced numbers of predatory bats and female frogs found in urban environments, providing a causal explanation for more conspicuous and attractive sexual signalling in males from urban populations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1410-1420
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of evolutionary biology
Volume38
Issue number10
Early online date15 Jul 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Evolutionary Biology.

Funding

Funding for this study was provided by the European Research Council Starting Grant (802460) awarded to W.H. Cindy Cifuentes provided significant support for the data col-lection of this experiment. We would also like to thank RonLootens, Wesley Delmeer, and Matthijs Luger from the VUelectronic workshop for their help designing the playback se-tups. Judith Smit provided important advice on experimentaldesign and on statistical analysis, alongside Estefania Velilla,Peter Moran, and Matías Muñoz. Floris van Rhijn signifi-cantly improved the video scoring process by identifying andrunning motion detection software. We thank the SmithsonianTropical Research Institute, and in particular Rachel Page andGregg Cohen, for their logistical support, and thank the Au-toridad del Canal de Panamá for use of field locations. Funding for this study was provided by the European Research Council Starting Grant (802460) awarded to W.H. Acknowledgments

Keywords

  • artificial light at night
  • Engystomops pustulosus
  • natural selection
  • noise pollution
  • predator–prey interaction
  • sexual selection
  • Trachops cirrhosus
  • urbanization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Noise pollution and artificial light at night alter selection pressures on sexual signals in an urban adapter'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this