Abstract
This article reflects on the role of normativity in defining extremism and evaluates Cassam’s understanding of fundamentalism.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1038-1043 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Critical Studies on Terrorism |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 10 Jun 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:FWork on this article/chapter/book was made possible by Rik Peels’ project EXTREME (Extreme Beliefs: The Epistemology and Ethics of Fundamentalism), which has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Grant agreement No. 851613) and from the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Funding
FWork on this article/chapter/book was made possible by Rik Peels’ project EXTREME (Extreme Beliefs: The Epistemology and Ethics of Fundamentalism), which has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Grant agreement No. 851613) and from the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Keywords
- Conceptual analysis
- definition
- extremism
- fanaticism
- fundamentalism
- normativity
