(Not) alone in the world: Cheating in the presence of a virtual observer

Jantsje Mol, E.C.M. van der Heijden, J.J.M. Potters

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We conducted an experiment in a high-immersive virtual reality environment to study the effect of the presence of a virtual observer on cheating behavior. Participants were placed in a virtual room and played 30 rounds of a cheating game without a chance of their cheating being detected. We varied whether or not a virtual observer (an avatar) was present in the room, and, if so, whether the avatar was actively staring at the decision maker or passively seated in a corner watching his smartphone. Results display significantly less cheating with an active than with a passive avatar, but not less cheating than in a control condition without an avatar. This suggests that an active (virtual) observer can intensify reputational concerns, but that the presence of someone passive and uninterested may actually alleviate such concerns.
Original languageEnglish
JournalExperimental Economics
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 14 Jan 2020

Fingerprint

Observer
Cheating
Avatar
Decision maker
Virtual reality
Experiment

Keywords

  • Virtual reality experiment
  • Cheating
  • Watching eyes effect

Cite this

@article{6c149ee4e468448d943d509ced24e148,
title = "(Not) alone in the world: Cheating in the presence of a virtual observer",
abstract = "We conducted an experiment in a high-immersive virtual reality environment to study the effect of the presence of a virtual observer on cheating behavior. Participants were placed in a virtual room and played 30 rounds of a cheating game without a chance of their cheating being detected. We varied whether or not a virtual observer (an avatar) was present in the room, and, if so, whether the avatar was actively staring at the decision maker or passively seated in a corner watching his smartphone. Results display significantly less cheating with an active than with a passive avatar, but not less cheating than in a control condition without an avatar. This suggests that an active (virtual) observer can intensify reputational concerns, but that the presence of someone passive and uninterested may actually alleviate such concerns.",
keywords = "Virtual reality experiment, Cheating, Watching eyes effect",
author = "Jantsje Mol and {van der Heijden}, E.C.M. and J.J.M. Potters",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "14",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-020-09644-0",
language = "English",
journal = "Experimental Economics",
issn = "1386-4157",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

(Not) alone in the world: Cheating in the presence of a virtual observer. / Mol, Jantsje; van der Heijden, E.C.M.; Potters, J.J.M.

In: Experimental Economics, 14.01.2020.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - (Not) alone in the world: Cheating in the presence of a virtual observer

AU - Mol, Jantsje

AU - van der Heijden, E.C.M.

AU - Potters, J.J.M.

PY - 2020/1/14

Y1 - 2020/1/14

N2 - We conducted an experiment in a high-immersive virtual reality environment to study the effect of the presence of a virtual observer on cheating behavior. Participants were placed in a virtual room and played 30 rounds of a cheating game without a chance of their cheating being detected. We varied whether or not a virtual observer (an avatar) was present in the room, and, if so, whether the avatar was actively staring at the decision maker or passively seated in a corner watching his smartphone. Results display significantly less cheating with an active than with a passive avatar, but not less cheating than in a control condition without an avatar. This suggests that an active (virtual) observer can intensify reputational concerns, but that the presence of someone passive and uninterested may actually alleviate such concerns.

AB - We conducted an experiment in a high-immersive virtual reality environment to study the effect of the presence of a virtual observer on cheating behavior. Participants were placed in a virtual room and played 30 rounds of a cheating game without a chance of their cheating being detected. We varied whether or not a virtual observer (an avatar) was present in the room, and, if so, whether the avatar was actively staring at the decision maker or passively seated in a corner watching his smartphone. Results display significantly less cheating with an active than with a passive avatar, but not less cheating than in a control condition without an avatar. This suggests that an active (virtual) observer can intensify reputational concerns, but that the presence of someone passive and uninterested may actually alleviate such concerns.

KW - Virtual reality experiment

KW - Cheating

KW - Watching eyes effect

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-020-09644-0

DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-020-09644-0

M3 - Article

JO - Experimental Economics

JF - Experimental Economics

SN - 1386-4157

ER -