Research output per year
Research output per year
Stefano Carattini*, Julia Blasch
Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
Social interventions are a popular tool to stimulate pro-social (including climate-friendly) behavior. Their use is, however, limited when the descriptive norm is low, i.e. when a desirable behavior is only practiced by a minority within the respective reference group. We tackle this issue by testing new strategies for social interventions, with an especially sophisticated target group. We implement a field experiment at two subsequent conferences in environmental economics, with which we examine the conference participants’ proclivity to offset carbon emissions. For the two treatment conditions that we introduce, we document an average null effect. Yet, for one condition, we find that the intervention can be effective when the targeted individuals feel socially close to the referenced peer group. Further, we find suggestive evidence that the effectiveness of such interventions increases as individuals are exposed to repeated treatment, but with decreasing marginal returns.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 102194 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-18 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics |
Volume | 110 |
Early online date | 20 Mar 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2024 |
We are grateful to the associate editor, Marco Casari, two anonymous reviewers, as well as Antonio Arechar, Wouter Botzen, Roger Fouquet, Garth Heutel, and Jantsje Mol for helpful comments on a previous version of this draft. The usual disclaimer applies. We also thank the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economics, and in particular Monica Eberle and Martina Gambaro, for the support in implementing the field experiment and for providing the data used in this study. Further, we thank Xiaoqian (Shirley) Zhang for excellent research assistance. Carattini acknowledges support from the Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment through the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and from the ESRC Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy as well as from the Swiss National Science Foundation , grant number PZ00P1_180006/1 . We are grateful to the associate editor, Marco Casari, two anonymous reviewers, as well as Antonio Arechar, Wouter Botzen, Roger Fouquet, Garth Heutel, and Jantsje Mol for helpful comments on a previous version of this draft. The usual disclaimer applies. We also thank the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economics, and in particular Monica Eberle and Martina Gambaro, for the support in implementing the field experiment and for providing the data used in this study. Further, we thank Xiaoqian (Shirley) Zhang for excellent research assistance. Carattini acknowledges support from the Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment, United States through the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and from the ESRC Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy as well as from the Swiss National Science Foundation, grant number PZ00P1_180006/1.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment | |
Economic and Social Research Council | |
European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists | |
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung | PZ00P1_180006/1, 180006 |
Research output: Working paper / Preprint › Working paper › Academic