Nudging when the descriptive norm is low: Evidence from a carbon offsetting field experiment

Stefano Carattini*, Julia Blasch

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Social interventions are a popular tool to stimulate pro-social (including climate-friendly) behavior. Their use is, however, limited when the descriptive norm is low, i.e. when a desirable behavior is only practiced by a minority within the respective reference group. We tackle this issue by testing new strategies for social interventions, with an especially sophisticated target group. We implement a field experiment at two subsequent conferences in environmental economics, with which we examine the conference participants’ proclivity to offset carbon emissions. For the two treatment conditions that we introduce, we document an average null effect. Yet, for one condition, we find that the intervention can be effective when the targeted individuals feel socially close to the referenced peer group. Further, we find suggestive evidence that the effectiveness of such interventions increases as individuals are exposed to repeated treatment, but with decreasing marginal returns.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102194
Pages (from-to)1-18
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
Volume110
Early online date20 Mar 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Inc.

Funding

We are grateful to the associate editor, Marco Casari, two anonymous reviewers, as well as Antonio Arechar, Wouter Botzen, Roger Fouquet, Garth Heutel, and Jantsje Mol for helpful comments on a previous version of this draft. The usual disclaimer applies. We also thank the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economics, and in particular Monica Eberle and Martina Gambaro, for the support in implementing the field experiment and for providing the data used in this study. Further, we thank Xiaoqian (Shirley) Zhang for excellent research assistance. Carattini acknowledges support from the Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment through the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and from the ESRC Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy as well as from the Swiss National Science Foundation , grant number PZ00P1_180006/1 . We are grateful to the associate editor, Marco Casari, two anonymous reviewers, as well as Antonio Arechar, Wouter Botzen, Roger Fouquet, Garth Heutel, and Jantsje Mol for helpful comments on a previous version of this draft. The usual disclaimer applies. We also thank the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economics, and in particular Monica Eberle and Martina Gambaro, for the support in implementing the field experiment and for providing the data used in this study. Further, we thank Xiaoqian (Shirley) Zhang for excellent research assistance. Carattini acknowledges support from the Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment, United States through the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and from the ESRC Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy as well as from the Swiss National Science Foundation, grant number PZ00P1_180006/1.

FundersFunder number
Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment
Economic and Social Research Council
European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungPZ00P1_180006/1, 180006

    Keywords

    • Carbon offsets
    • Field experiment
    • Nudge
    • Social identity
    • Social norms

    Cite this