Abstract
Objective: To examine the association between self-reported activity pacing (a strategy to manage fatigue symptoms) and objectively-measured physical activity behaviours in adults with multiple sclerosis. Design: Single cross-sectional study Setting: Multiple sclerosis rehabilitation centre in Colchester, United Kingdom. Subjects: Twenty-one adults (59 ± 9 years) with multiple sclerosis. Main measures: Physical activity behaviours (activity level: activity counts per minute; activity variability: highest activity counts per minute each day divided by activity counts per minute on that day) were measured with accelerometers. Self-reported activity pacing (Activity Pacing and Risk of Overactivity Questionnaire), fatigue severity (Fatigue Severity Scale) and health-related quality of life (RAND-12-Item Short-Form Health Survey) were measured. Scatter plots were used to explore associations between measures. Results: Activity level was 258 ± 133 counts per minutes, activity variability was 4 ± 1, self-reported activity pacing was 3 ± 1, fatigue severity was 5 ± 2 and health-related quality of life was 43 ± 8. Increased self-reported activity pacing was associated with lower activity levels and less variability in daily activities. Conclusion: This investigation suggests that people with multiple sclerosis who have low physical activity levels could be inappropriately using activity pacing as a reactionary response to their multiple sclerosis symptoms.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1781-1788 |
Journal | Clinical Rehabilitation |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 12 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2021 |
Externally published | Yes |
Funding
The authors would like to thank all participants for their contribution to the study. Furthermore, we would like to thank Multiple Sclerosis-UK (a national charity, based in Colchester, which supports people with multiple sclerosis and who regularly run exercise classes for people with multiple sclerosis) and the local Colchester Multiple Sclerosis Society, for their support in the study. The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Colchester Multiple Sclerosis Society |