Observer variation in the histopathologic assessment of extranodal tumor spread in lymph node metastases in the neck

M.W.M. van den Brekel, W.L. Lodder, H.V. Stel, E. Bloemena, C.R. Leemans, I. van der Waal

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background
Extranodal spread (ENS) of tumors is widely used as a prognosticator for patients with head and neck cancer and is used as an indicator for postoperative treatment. However, the histopathologic agreement among pathologists on the assessment of the presence or absence of this criterion has never been studied.

Methods
The interobserver and intraobserver agreement among 10 pathologists on the diagnosis of ENS in 41 tumor-positive lymph nodes was evaluated.

Results
The kappa value of the interobserver agreement among pathologists varied between 0.14 and 0.75, the overall kappa value was 0.42 and 0.49 in the 2 scoring sessions. The intraobserver kappa value varied between 0.49 and 0.95.

Conclusion
The intraobserver and interobserver agreement among pathologists in the assessment of the presence of ENS was low in metastatic lymph nodes in the neck. Because of the widely accepted prognostic significance and therapeutic consequences of ENS, there is a need for internationally accepted reproducible criterion for the histopathologic assessment of ENS in metastatic lymph nodes in the neck.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)840-845
JournalHead and Neck
Volume34
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Observer variation in the histopathologic assessment of extranodal tumor spread in lymph node metastases in the neck'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this