Abstract
This paper highlights the bias in returns to scale or price-cost markup coefficients when estimated from the inverse of a production relationship. Coefficients estimated from the inverse are larger than when estimated directly, and the size of the bias increases as the price-cost markup or the scale elasticity of the underlying production function gets smaller. An instrumental variables estimator, although consistent, still exhibits a small sample bias if more than one instrument is used. For comparison, direct estimates of scale elasticities are provided for two-digit SIC private business sectors and for four-digit manufacturing sectors. Little evidence is found for increasing returns to scale in the manufacturing sector.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 59-67 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Economics Letters |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1995 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- Instrumental variables
- Price markup
- Returns to scale
- Small sample bias
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver