On international equity weights and national decision making on climate change

D. Anthoff, R.S.J. Tol

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Estimates of the marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions require the aggregation of monetised impacts of climate change over people with different incomes and in different jurisdictions. Implicitly or explicitly, such estimates assume a social welfare function and hence a particular attitude towards equity and justice. We show that previous approaches to equity weighting are inappropriate from a national decision maker's point of view, because domestic impacts are not valued at domestic values. We propose four alternatives (sovereignty, altruism, good neighbour, and compensation) with different views on concern for and liability towards foreigners. The four alternatives imply radically different estimates of the social cost of carbon and hence the optimal intensity of climate policy. © 2010 Elsevier Inc.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)14-20
JournalJournal of Environmental Economics and Management
Volume60
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On international equity weights and national decision making on climate change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this