Abstract
Transparency and observability have been shown to foster ethical decision-making as people tend to comply with an underlying norm for honesty. However, in situations implying a social norm for dishonesty, this might be different. In a die-rolling experiment, we investigate whether observability can also have detrimental effects. We thus introduce a norm nudge toward honesty or dishonesty and make participants’ decisions observable and open to the judgement of other participants in order to manipulate the observability of people's decisions as well as the underlying social norm. We find that a nudge toward honesty indeed increases the level of honesty, suggesting that such a norm nudge can successfully induce behavioral change. Our introduction of social image concerns via observability, however, does not affect honesty and does not interact with our norm nudge.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1086-1099 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization |
Volume | 212 |
Early online date | 6 Jul 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:We thank Daniela Puzzello (the editor), an anonymous reviewer, Eugen Dimant, Susanna Grundmann, Kim Peters, Julia Rose, as well as conference participants at the ESA 2021 Online Meeting, GfeW Annual Meeting 2021 in Magdeburg, Young Economists’ Meeting 2022 in Brno, seminar participants at WU Vienna, and participants at the UEA Summer School in Behavioral Game Theory 2020 by David J. Cooper, for helpful comments and suggestions. We also thank Simeon Schudy for providing the video recordings of the die rolls used in Kocher, Schudy, & Spantig (2018). Financial support from the German Research Association (DFG, GRK 2503), the German Association for Experimental Economic Research (GfeW), the University of Innsbruck (BAFIT Netzwerk Banking, Accounting, Auditing, Finance & IT), and the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (ERC grant number 771391 awarded to B. Beersma) is gratefully acknowledged. The main study was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF): DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U9HRQ.
Funding Information:
We thank Daniela Puzzello (the editor), an anonymous reviewer, Eugen Dimant, Susanna Grundmann, Kim Peters, Julia Rose, as well as conference participants at the ESA 2021 Online Meeting, GfeW Annual Meeting 2021 in Magdeburg, Young Economists’ Meeting 2022 in Brno, seminar participants at WU Vienna, and participants at the UEA Summer School in Behavioral Game Theory 2020 by David J. Cooper, for helpful comments and suggestions. We also thank Simeon Schudy for providing the video recordings of the die rolls used in Kocher, Schudy, & Spantig (2018). Financial support from the German Research Association (DFG, GRK 2503 ), the German Association for Experimental Economic Research (GfeW), the University of Innsbruck (BAFIT Netzwerk Banking, Accounting, Auditing, Finance & IT), and the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (ERC grant number 771391 awarded to B. Beersma) is gratefully acknowledged. The main study was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF): DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U9HRQ .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
Keywords
- Behavioral change
- Cheating
- Image concerns
- Lying
- Nudging
- Social norms