On the complexity of finding good proofs for description logic entailments

Christian Alrabbaa, Franz Baader, Stefan Borgwardt, Patrick Koopmann, Alisa Kovtunova

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

If a Description Logic (DL) system derives a consequence, then one can in principle explain such an entailment by presenting a proof of the consequence in an appropriate calculus. Intuitively, good proofs are ones that are simple enough to be comprehensible to a user of the system. In recent work, we have introduced a general framework in which proofs are represented as labeled, directed hypergraphs, and have investigated the complexity of finding small proofs. However, large size is not the only reason that can make a proof complex. In the present paper, we introduce other measures for the complexity of a proof, and analyze the computational complexity of deciding whether a given consequence has a proof of complexity at most q. This problem can be NP-complete even for EL, but we also identify measures where it can be decided in polynomial time.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDL 2020 - Proceedings of the 33rd International Workshop on Description Logics, co-located with the 17th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR 2020
EditorsS. Borgwardt, T. Meyer
PublisherCEUR-WS
Volume2663
Publication statusPublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes
Event33rd International Workshop on Description Logics, DL 2020 - Virtual, Online, Greece
Duration: 12 Sept 202014 Sept 2020

Publication series

NameCEUR Workshop Proceedings
ISSN (Print)1613-0073

Conference

Conference33rd International Workshop on Description Logics, DL 2020
Country/TerritoryGreece
CityVirtual, Online
Period12/09/2014/09/20

Funding

Acknowledgements This work was supported by the DFG in grant 389792660 as part of TRR 248 (https://perspicuous-computing.science), and QuantLA, GRK 1763 (https://lat.inf.tu-dresden.de/quantla). We also want to thank the anonymous reviewers for their many helpful comments.

FundersFunder number
QuantLAGRK 1763
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft389792660

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'On the complexity of finding good proofs for description logic entailments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this