On the Necessity of Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition: It Depends on the Need for Scene Segmentation

Noor Seijdel, Jessica Loke, Ron van de Klundert, Matthew van der Meer, Eva Quispel, Simon van Gaal, Edward H.F. de Haan, H. Steven Scholte

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

44 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Although feedforward activity may suffice for recognizing objects in isolation, additional visual operations that aid object recognition might be needed for real-world scenes. One such additional operation is figure-ground segmentation, extracting the relevant features and locations of the target object while ignoring irrelevant features. In this study of 60 human participants (female and male), we show objects on backgrounds of increasing complexity to investigate whether recurrent computations are increasingly important for segmenting objects from more complex backgrounds. Three lines of evidence show that recurrent processing is critical for recognition of objects embedded in complex scenes. First, behavioral results indicated a greater reduction in performance after masking objects presented on more complex backgrounds, with the degree of impairment increasing with increasing background complexity. Second, electroencephalography (EEG) measurements showed clear differences in the evoked response potentials between conditions around time points beyond feedforward activity, and exploratory object decoding analyses based on the EEG signal indicated later decoding onsets for objects embedded in more complex backgrounds. Third, deep convolutional neural network performance confirmed this interpretation. Feedforward and less deep networks showed a higher degree of impairment in recognition for objects in complex backgrounds compared with recurrent and deeper networks. Together, these results support the notion that recurrent computations drive figure-ground segmentation of objects in complex scenes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6281-6289
Number of pages9
JournalThe Journal of Neuroscience
Volume41
Issue number29
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Jul 2021

Funding

Received Nov. 9, 2020; revised Apr. 11, 2021; accepted May 13, 2021. Author contributions: N.S., J.L., R.v.d.K., M.v.d.M., E.Q., S.v.G., E.H.F.d.H., and H.S.S. designed research; N.S., J.L., R.v.d.K., M.v.d.M., and E.Q. performed research; N.S., J.L., R.v.d.K., M.v.d.M., and E.Q. analyzed data; and N.S. and J.L. wrote the paper This work was supported by Advanced Investigator Grant (No. 339374) from the European Research Council to E.F.H.d.H. and an Interdisciplinary Doctorate Agreement from the University of Amsterdam to H.S.S. and J.L. pN.S. and J.L. share first authorship. The authors declare no competing financial interests. Correspondence should be addressed to Noor Seijdel at [email protected]. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2851-20.2021 Copyright © 2021 the authors

FundersFunder number
Universiteit van Amsterdam
European Research Council
European Commission
Seventh Framework Programme339374

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'On the Necessity of Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition: It Depends on the Need for Scene Segmentation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this