On the performance of modern digital grammar checkers for native and second language learners: A study of gender marking in French

Marco Bril*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In this study we conducted an experiment aiming to compare the performance of language learners and digital grammar checkers at supplying gender marking in French. A set of test items exhibiting typical gender marking configurations was submitted to three grammar checkers for French (Antidote, Scribens and BonPatron). The outcomes were compared to those of native speakers and second language learners of French at a B1 level. The results revealed that only Antidote and Scribens outperformed both native speakers and second language learners of French in adjective-noun and fronted noun-past participle agreement constructions. An opposite pattern, however, appeared for clitic-past participle constructions for which native speakers outperformed Antidote and Scribens. We thus conclude that from the three grammar checkers under investigation, Antidote and Scribens might be effective to improve the native speakers' and second language learners' awareness of gender marking errors, but only in adjective-noun and fronted noun-past participle agreement constructions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)228-247
Number of pages20
JournalDutch Journal of Applied Linguistics
Volume8
Issue number2
Early online date7 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2019

Keywords

  • French
  • Gender marking
  • Grammar checkers
  • L1 acquisition
  • L2 acquisition

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'On the performance of modern digital grammar checkers for native and second language learners: A study of gender marking in French'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this