One for all? – The impact of different types of energy feedback and goal setting on individuals’ motivation to conserve electricity

Jeroen S. Brandsma, Julia E. Blasch

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We investigate how different types of energy feedback, combined with goal setting, impact on consumers' motivation to conserve electricity. Using an online survey, we test the influence of energy feedback in physical units (kWh), monetary values (EUR) and environmental values (avoided CO2 emissions). We asked participants to set themselves either a high, low or no energy conservation goal. In addition, we assess the respondents’ value types - hedonic, egoistic, altruistic and biospheric – to test predictions derived from goal framing theory. In general, individuals scoring high on biospheric values were more motivated to conserve electricity and their motivation did not increase in response to setting an energy conservation goal. Individuals with egoistic values seem less willing to reduce their electricity consumption, unless in the monetary feedback or high goal conditions. A high conservation goal was only found to be effective in combination with monetary feedback: it increased the motivation to save electricity by 6.7 percentage points in comparison to the low goal condition and 6.6 percentage points in comparison to the control condition.

Original languageEnglish
Article number110992
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume135
Early online date24 Sep 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2019

Fingerprint

Biospherics
electricity
Electricity
energy conservation
Feedback
energy
Energy conservation
environmental values
Conservation
prediction
comparison
test
electricity consumption

Keywords

  • Energy conservation behaviour
  • Energy feedback
  • Goal framing
  • Goal setting
  • Value orientation

Cite this

@article{e8b929885a674219aaa41b756817b480,
title = "One for all? – The impact of different types of energy feedback and goal setting on individuals’ motivation to conserve electricity",
abstract = "We investigate how different types of energy feedback, combined with goal setting, impact on consumers' motivation to conserve electricity. Using an online survey, we test the influence of energy feedback in physical units (kWh), monetary values (EUR) and environmental values (avoided CO2 emissions). We asked participants to set themselves either a high, low or no energy conservation goal. In addition, we assess the respondents’ value types - hedonic, egoistic, altruistic and biospheric – to test predictions derived from goal framing theory. In general, individuals scoring high on biospheric values were more motivated to conserve electricity and their motivation did not increase in response to setting an energy conservation goal. Individuals with egoistic values seem less willing to reduce their electricity consumption, unless in the monetary feedback or high goal conditions. A high conservation goal was only found to be effective in combination with monetary feedback: it increased the motivation to save electricity by 6.7 percentage points in comparison to the low goal condition and 6.6 percentage points in comparison to the control condition.",
keywords = "Energy conservation behaviour, Energy feedback, Goal framing, Goal setting, Value orientation",
author = "Brandsma, {Jeroen S.} and Blasch, {Julia E.}",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110992",
language = "English",
volume = "135",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

One for all? – The impact of different types of energy feedback and goal setting on individuals’ motivation to conserve electricity. / Brandsma, Jeroen S.; Blasch, Julia E.

In: Energy Policy, Vol. 135, 110992, 01.12.2019, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - One for all? – The impact of different types of energy feedback and goal setting on individuals’ motivation to conserve electricity

AU - Brandsma, Jeroen S.

AU - Blasch, Julia E.

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - We investigate how different types of energy feedback, combined with goal setting, impact on consumers' motivation to conserve electricity. Using an online survey, we test the influence of energy feedback in physical units (kWh), monetary values (EUR) and environmental values (avoided CO2 emissions). We asked participants to set themselves either a high, low or no energy conservation goal. In addition, we assess the respondents’ value types - hedonic, egoistic, altruistic and biospheric – to test predictions derived from goal framing theory. In general, individuals scoring high on biospheric values were more motivated to conserve electricity and their motivation did not increase in response to setting an energy conservation goal. Individuals with egoistic values seem less willing to reduce their electricity consumption, unless in the monetary feedback or high goal conditions. A high conservation goal was only found to be effective in combination with monetary feedback: it increased the motivation to save electricity by 6.7 percentage points in comparison to the low goal condition and 6.6 percentage points in comparison to the control condition.

AB - We investigate how different types of energy feedback, combined with goal setting, impact on consumers' motivation to conserve electricity. Using an online survey, we test the influence of energy feedback in physical units (kWh), monetary values (EUR) and environmental values (avoided CO2 emissions). We asked participants to set themselves either a high, low or no energy conservation goal. In addition, we assess the respondents’ value types - hedonic, egoistic, altruistic and biospheric – to test predictions derived from goal framing theory. In general, individuals scoring high on biospheric values were more motivated to conserve electricity and their motivation did not increase in response to setting an energy conservation goal. Individuals with egoistic values seem less willing to reduce their electricity consumption, unless in the monetary feedback or high goal conditions. A high conservation goal was only found to be effective in combination with monetary feedback: it increased the motivation to save electricity by 6.7 percentage points in comparison to the low goal condition and 6.6 percentage points in comparison to the control condition.

KW - Energy conservation behaviour

KW - Energy feedback

KW - Goal framing

KW - Goal setting

KW - Value orientation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072523598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072523598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110992

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110992

M3 - Article

VL - 135

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

M1 - 110992

ER -