‘Only the strangest and most horrible cases’: The Role of Judicial Violence in the Work of Jan Luyken

M.F. van Duijnen

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In 1685, Dutch Calvinist publishers brought to the market a new edition of the Anabaptist martyrology Het bloedig tooneel. Marketed mainly towards wealthy Dutch Anabaptists, the book included 104 high-quality etchings made by the Amsterdam artist Jan Luyken. Famous for their explicit depiction of executions, these images of martyrdom have been studied and explained mainly with reference to Luyken’s Anabaptist leanings, older illustrated martyrologies, and the textual elements of Het bloedig tooneel. However, Luyken matched his work on martyrdom with an impressive production of secular execution prints that are often indistinguishable from their religious counterparts. Taking these similarities as a point of departure, this article will argue that Luyken’s work was not solely concerned with religious and political views, but also with judicial violence as a visual theme in its own right. Besides partisan or sacred readings of violence, Luyken’s prints framed executions in terms of diversity and specificity, leading to the production of a wide variety of explicit and unique images of beheadings, hangings, and burnings. Within this context, Luyken’s execution prints turned scaffold violence into a marketable theme that was eagerly exploited by Amsterdam publishers across a wide variety of illustrated books.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2
Pages (from-to)169-197
Number of pages29
JournalEarly Modern Low Countries
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Dec 2018

Funding

1 Stol, Verhandeling van den christelijken leidsman, 429-30: ‘Indien gy geen Tijtel-plaeteu of anderen wilt maken/als voor soodanige boeken/die geheel met u verstant over-een-komen. Soo is ’t tijd dat gy “er uyt scheyt; maer ik zie u prenten in soo-danige boeken/en voor soodanige saken/daer van ik meen/dat gy in u herte een aller-grootste afgrijsen hebt: soo van Moorden/Worgen/Branden en Bloed-vergieten/gelijk de kruys-vaerden daer van overloopen.’ This article is the result of my work as a PhD candidate within the research programme Imagineer-ing Violence. Techniques of Early Modern Performativity in the Northern and Southern Netherlands, 1630-1690, financed by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (nwo). Part of the research for this article was carried out at the Gotha Research Library and made possible by the Herzog-Ernst scholarship financed by the Fritz Thyssen Stiftung. I would like to thank the emlc editors, the anonymous reviewers, as well as Yannice De Bruyn, Inger Leemans, Frans-Willem Korsten, and Erika Kuijpers for their helpful feedback on earlier versions of this paper. 2 The argument between Luyken and Stol took place in an exchange of letters, which were later published by Stol in his anti-Boehme booklet Verhandeling van den christelijken leidsman. 3 For a discussion of their religious differences, see Van der Does, ‘Het Conflict tusschen Barend Joosten Stol en Jan Luyken’.

FundersFunder number
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Fritz Thyssen Stiftung

    Keywords

    • Art history
    • Book history
    • Executions
    • Jan Luyken
    • Print culture
    • Violence
    • martyrdom

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '‘Only the strangest and most horrible cases’: The Role of Judicial Violence in the Work of Jan Luyken'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this