Opposing views on the urgency for healthcare changes in the Netherlands: A temporal narrative struggle

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademic

Abstract

This paper illuminates the way multiple narratives concerning urgency for
change dynamically interact on different levels and influence change
processes in healthcare organizations. It explores the processes of sensemaking
and opposing urgency narratives during a period of implementation for
new legislation within the Dutch healthcare sector. Building on recent debates
on process theory, narratives, and temporality, a new perspective on change
urgency is presented, which shows how urgency is not unilaterally created
from one position but is produced and reproduced by different editors in a
narrative struggle. A temporal framework for change urgency was developed
to study these narrative dynamics. Three urgency narratives contested the
dominant narrative in the public discourse. The article shows how directors
of healthcare organizations, dominated by these narratives, also hold narrative
power. Managing change processes implies managing discourse.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)343-359
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Service Science and Management
Volume11
Issue number4
Early online date1 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018

Fingerprint

Netherlands
narrative
discourse
editor
legislation

Keywords

  • Change Urgency
  • Critical Discourse Analysis
  • Temporality
  • Narratives

Cite this

@article{7f4e3f1a4bd24b668991d23cea589e46,
title = "Opposing views on the urgency for healthcare changes in the Netherlands: A temporal narrative struggle",
abstract = "This paper illuminates the way multiple narratives concerning urgency forchange dynamically interact on different levels and influence changeprocesses in healthcare organizations. It explores the processes of sensemakingand opposing urgency narratives during a period of implementation fornew legislation within the Dutch healthcare sector. Building on recent debateson process theory, narratives, and temporality, a new perspective on changeurgency is presented, which shows how urgency is not unilaterally createdfrom one position but is produced and reproduced by different editors in anarrative struggle. A temporal framework for change urgency was developedto study these narrative dynamics. Three urgency narratives contested thedominant narrative in the public discourse. The article shows how directorsof healthcare organizations, dominated by these narratives, also hold narrativepower. Managing change processes implies managing discourse.",
keywords = "Change Urgency, Critical Discourse Analysis, Temporality, Narratives",
author = "{van Nistelrooij}, A.T.M. and {van Ooijen}, M.C. and M.B. Veenswijk",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
doi = "10.4236/jssm.2018.114024",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "343--359",
journal = "Journal of Service Science and Management",
issn = "1940-9907",
publisher = "Scientific Research Publishing",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Opposing views on the urgency for healthcare changes in the Netherlands: A temporal narrative struggle

AU - van Nistelrooij, A.T.M.

AU - van Ooijen, M.C.

AU - Veenswijk, M.B.

PY - 2018/8

Y1 - 2018/8

N2 - This paper illuminates the way multiple narratives concerning urgency forchange dynamically interact on different levels and influence changeprocesses in healthcare organizations. It explores the processes of sensemakingand opposing urgency narratives during a period of implementation fornew legislation within the Dutch healthcare sector. Building on recent debateson process theory, narratives, and temporality, a new perspective on changeurgency is presented, which shows how urgency is not unilaterally createdfrom one position but is produced and reproduced by different editors in anarrative struggle. A temporal framework for change urgency was developedto study these narrative dynamics. Three urgency narratives contested thedominant narrative in the public discourse. The article shows how directorsof healthcare organizations, dominated by these narratives, also hold narrativepower. Managing change processes implies managing discourse.

AB - This paper illuminates the way multiple narratives concerning urgency forchange dynamically interact on different levels and influence changeprocesses in healthcare organizations. It explores the processes of sensemakingand opposing urgency narratives during a period of implementation fornew legislation within the Dutch healthcare sector. Building on recent debateson process theory, narratives, and temporality, a new perspective on changeurgency is presented, which shows how urgency is not unilaterally createdfrom one position but is produced and reproduced by different editors in anarrative struggle. A temporal framework for change urgency was developedto study these narrative dynamics. Three urgency narratives contested thedominant narrative in the public discourse. The article shows how directorsof healthcare organizations, dominated by these narratives, also hold narrativepower. Managing change processes implies managing discourse.

KW - Change Urgency

KW - Critical Discourse Analysis

KW - Temporality

KW - Narratives

U2 - 10.4236/jssm.2018.114024

DO - 10.4236/jssm.2018.114024

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 343

EP - 359

JO - Journal of Service Science and Management

JF - Journal of Service Science and Management

SN - 1940-9907

IS - 4

ER -