Abstract
An optimized low volume sampler was developed to determine both gas- and particle bound concentrations of short and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins (S/MCCPs). Background contamination was limited by the sampler design, providing method quantification limits (MQLs) at least two orders of magnitude lower than other studies within the gas (MQL: 500 pg (ΣSCCPs), 1.86 ng (ΣMCCPs)) and particle (MQL: 500 pg (ΣSCCPs), 1.72 ng (ΣMCCPs) phases. Good repeatability was observed between parallel indoor measurements (RSD ≤ 9.3% (gas), RSD ≤ 14% (particle)) with no breakthrough/saturation observed after a week of continuous sampling. For indoor air sampling, SCCPs were dominant within the gas phase (17 ± 4.9 ng/m3) compared to MCCPs (2.7 ± 0.8 ng/m3) while the opposite was observed in the particle bound fraction (0.28 ± 0.11 ng/m3 (ΣSCCPs) vs. 2.7 ± 1.0 ng/m3 (ΣMCCPs)). Only SCCPs in the gas phase could be detected reliably during outdoor sampling and were considerably lower compared to indoor concentrations (0.27 ± 0.10 ng/m3). Separation of the gas and particle bound phase was found to be crucial in applying the appropriate response factors for quantification based on the deconvoluted S/MCCP sample profile, thus avoiding over- (gas phase) or underestimation (particle phase) of reported concentrations. Very short chain chlorinated paraffins (vSCCPs, C5-C9) were also detected at equal or higher abundance compared to SCCP congener groups (C10-C13) congener groups, indicating an additional human indoor inhalation risk.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 130066 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-9 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Chemosphere |
| Volume | 275 |
| Early online date | 23 Feb 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Financial support for this study was provided by the Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment through the Strategic Institute Programs, granted through the Norwegian Research Council (Arctic, the herald of Chemical Substances of Environmental Concern, Clean Arctic, project #117031 ) and the Fram Centre Flagship Program “Hazardous substances – effects on ecosystems and human health” (Project 481/762019: Screening for Emerging Arctic health Risks to Circumpolar Human populations (SEARCH)). Financial support was also received through the Erasmus + programme of the European Union . We also thank Svein Knudsen and his team for developing the sampler template (Innovation NILU AS).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Funding
Financial support for this study was provided by the Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment through the Strategic Institute Programs, granted through the Norwegian Research Council (Arctic, the herald of Chemical Substances of Environmental Concern, Clean Arctic, project #117031 ) and the Fram Centre Flagship Program “Hazardous substances – effects on ecosystems and human health” (Project 481/762019: Screening for Emerging Arctic health Risks to Circumpolar Human populations (SEARCH)). Financial support was also received through the Erasmus + programme of the European Union . We also thank Svein Knudsen and his team for developing the sampler template (Innovation NILU AS).
Keywords
- Air monitoring
- Air sampler
- Chlorinated paraffins
- Indoor air
- Method development
- Particulate matter