Organizing the HRM function: Responses to paradoxes, variety, and dynamism

Anne Keegan, Ilja Bitterling, Hella Sylva, Ludwig Hoeksema

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We develop empirically based insights from five case studies and argue that how actors respond to paradoxical tensions helps to explain variety and dynamism in how the HRM function is organized. It also helps to clarify why widely popular models with clearly prescribed structures take on a variety of forms in practice and are dynamic. We contribute to theorizing on the HRM function by introducing a dynamic, tension-centered perspective, based on paradox theory, that builds on previous research on the organization of the HRM function and the challenges facing HRM practitioners working within any particular model to organize HRM work. We discuss the limitations of our study, as well as offering suggestions for future research and practical implications from paradox theory for HRM practitioners dealing with tensions in their work.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1111-1126
Number of pages16
JournalHuman Resource Management
Volume57
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Research
Organizing
Dynamism
Paradox
Theorizing

Keywords

  • dynamism
  • HRM
  • organization
  • paradox
  • responses
  • tensions
  • variety

Cite this

Keegan, Anne ; Bitterling, Ilja ; Sylva, Hella ; Hoeksema, Ludwig. / Organizing the HRM function : Responses to paradoxes, variety, and dynamism. In: Human Resource Management. 2018 ; Vol. 57, No. 5. pp. 1111-1126.
@article{595f6b8953994286b7507fb974b61498,
title = "Organizing the HRM function: Responses to paradoxes, variety, and dynamism",
abstract = "We develop empirically based insights from five case studies and argue that how actors respond to paradoxical tensions helps to explain variety and dynamism in how the HRM function is organized. It also helps to clarify why widely popular models with clearly prescribed structures take on a variety of forms in practice and are dynamic. We contribute to theorizing on the HRM function by introducing a dynamic, tension-centered perspective, based on paradox theory, that builds on previous research on the organization of the HRM function and the challenges facing HRM practitioners working within any particular model to organize HRM work. We discuss the limitations of our study, as well as offering suggestions for future research and practical implications from paradox theory for HRM practitioners dealing with tensions in their work.",
keywords = "dynamism, HRM, organization, paradox, responses, tensions, variety",
author = "Anne Keegan and Ilja Bitterling and Hella Sylva and Ludwig Hoeksema",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1002/hrm.21893",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "1111--1126",
journal = "Human Resource Management",
issn = "0090-4848",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "5",

}

Organizing the HRM function : Responses to paradoxes, variety, and dynamism. / Keegan, Anne; Bitterling, Ilja; Sylva, Hella; Hoeksema, Ludwig.

In: Human Resource Management, Vol. 57, No. 5, 09.2018, p. 1111-1126.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organizing the HRM function

T2 - Responses to paradoxes, variety, and dynamism

AU - Keegan, Anne

AU - Bitterling, Ilja

AU - Sylva, Hella

AU - Hoeksema, Ludwig

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - We develop empirically based insights from five case studies and argue that how actors respond to paradoxical tensions helps to explain variety and dynamism in how the HRM function is organized. It also helps to clarify why widely popular models with clearly prescribed structures take on a variety of forms in practice and are dynamic. We contribute to theorizing on the HRM function by introducing a dynamic, tension-centered perspective, based on paradox theory, that builds on previous research on the organization of the HRM function and the challenges facing HRM practitioners working within any particular model to organize HRM work. We discuss the limitations of our study, as well as offering suggestions for future research and practical implications from paradox theory for HRM practitioners dealing with tensions in their work.

AB - We develop empirically based insights from five case studies and argue that how actors respond to paradoxical tensions helps to explain variety and dynamism in how the HRM function is organized. It also helps to clarify why widely popular models with clearly prescribed structures take on a variety of forms in practice and are dynamic. We contribute to theorizing on the HRM function by introducing a dynamic, tension-centered perspective, based on paradox theory, that builds on previous research on the organization of the HRM function and the challenges facing HRM practitioners working within any particular model to organize HRM work. We discuss the limitations of our study, as well as offering suggestions for future research and practical implications from paradox theory for HRM practitioners dealing with tensions in their work.

KW - dynamism

KW - HRM

KW - organization

KW - paradox

KW - responses

KW - tensions

KW - variety

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051862578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051862578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hrm.21893

DO - 10.1002/hrm.21893

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 1111

EP - 1126

JO - Human Resource Management

JF - Human Resource Management

SN - 0090-4848

IS - 5

ER -