Orthodox kaleidoscope: heterogeneity, complexity, and dynamics in the Russian Orthodox Church. An introduction

Katya Tolstaya*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademic

Abstract

This introduction to ‘Orthodox Kaleidoscope: Heterogeneity, Complexity, and Dynamics in the Russian Orthodox Church’ sheds light on its contributions from a methodological-theoretical angle. Six of the seven contributions to this issue spring from an interdisciplinary academic network established in 2015 by scholars of 15 institutions in search of approaches and theories that would do justice to the multifaceted and fluid return of the Russian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate) to society and (geo-)politics after perestroika. One of the challenges this Orthodox revival presents to scholarship is an extreme heterogeneity of groups, worldviews, and teachings, each claiming to represent ‘true’ Orthodoxy by virtue of their belonging to Orthodox Tradition. Such belonging grants the right to exist and exercise sacral authority on micro-, meso- and macro-levels, but also involves a non-belonging, a simultaneous insider and outsider perspective of Orthodoxy/Orthodox Tradition. Since this problem arises in each situation when such an overreaching position (sub specie aeternitatis) is claimed, it is common to each religious tradition and is therefore pertinent to religious studies more broadly. In the Introduction I discuss this variation of Russell’s paradox and the ways to overcome this conceptual problem.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)80-89
Number of pages10
JournalReligion, State and Society
Volume48
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 May 2020

Keywords

  • post-Soviet religious revival
  • Russell’s paradox
  • Russian Orthodox Church
  • Theory and methodology in study of religion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Orthodox kaleidoscope: heterogeneity, complexity, and dynamics in the Russian Orthodox Church. An introduction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this