TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcome measures for Alzheimer's disease
T2 - A global inter-societal Delphi consensus
AU - Ellison, Tim S.
AU - Cappa, Stefano F.
AU - Garrett, Dawne
AU - Georges, Jean
AU - Iwatsubo, Takeshi
AU - Kramer, Joel H.
AU - Lehmann, Maryna
AU - Lyketsos, Constantine
AU - Maier, Andrea B.
AU - Merrilees, Jennifer
AU - Morris, John C.
AU - Naismith, Sharon L.
AU - Nobili, Flavio
AU - Pahor, Marco
AU - Pond, Dimity
AU - Robinson, Louise
AU - Soysal, Pinar
AU - Vandenbulcke, Mathieu
AU - Weber, Christopher J.
AU - Visser, Pieter Jelle
AU - Weiner, Michael
AU - Frisoni, Giovanni B.
PY - 2023/6/1
Y1 - 2023/6/1
N2 - Introduction: We aim to provide guidance on outcomes and measures for use in patients with Alzheimer's clinical syndrome. Methods: A consensus group of 20 voting members nominated by 10 professional societies, and a non-voting chair, used a Delphi approach and modified GRADE criteria. Results: Consensus was reached on priority outcomes (n = 66), measures (n = 49) and statements (n = 37) across nine domains. A number of outcomes and measurement instruments were ranked for: Cognitive abilities; Functional abilities/dependency; Behavioural and neuropsychiatric symptoms; Patient quality of life (QoL); Caregiver QoL; Healthcare and treatment-related outcomes; Medical investigations; Disease-related life events; and Global outcomes. Discussion: This work provides indications on the domains and ideal pertinent measurement instruments that clinicians may wish to use to follow patients with cognitive impairment. More work is needed to develop instruments that are more feasible in the context of the constraints of clinical routine.
AB - Introduction: We aim to provide guidance on outcomes and measures for use in patients with Alzheimer's clinical syndrome. Methods: A consensus group of 20 voting members nominated by 10 professional societies, and a non-voting chair, used a Delphi approach and modified GRADE criteria. Results: Consensus was reached on priority outcomes (n = 66), measures (n = 49) and statements (n = 37) across nine domains. A number of outcomes and measurement instruments were ranked for: Cognitive abilities; Functional abilities/dependency; Behavioural and neuropsychiatric symptoms; Patient quality of life (QoL); Caregiver QoL; Healthcare and treatment-related outcomes; Medical investigations; Disease-related life events; and Global outcomes. Discussion: This work provides indications on the domains and ideal pertinent measurement instruments that clinicians may wish to use to follow patients with cognitive impairment. More work is needed to develop instruments that are more feasible in the context of the constraints of clinical routine.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85163052521&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/alz.12945
DO - 10.1002/alz.12945
M3 - Article
SN - 1552-5260
VL - 19
SP - 2707
EP - 2729
JO - Alzheimer's and Dementia
JF - Alzheimer's and Dementia
IS - 6
ER -